Paper · 2019 · Journal of AgriSearch

IMPACT OF WHEAT ESTABLISHMENT METHODS AND WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON WEED FLORA, YIELD AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF WHEAT IN RICE-WHEAT CROPPING SYSTEM

MOHAN SINGH; OMBIR SINGH; ROHITASAV SINGH

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar during continuous two years to study the weed flora, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different wheat establishment methods in main plots and seven weed management in sub plots. Phalaris minor was the most dominant weed at 60 DAS contributed 55.0 per cent of total weed population. Melilotusindica was the major non grassy weeds in wheat which contributed 11 per cent to total weed population during respective years. Sowing of wheat with zero tillage significantly reduced the Phalaris minor density as compared to conventionally tilled wheat after transplanted rice, 60 per cent Phalaris minor emerged from 0-3 cm in reduced and conventional tillage where as in zero tillage after transplanted rice there was 55 per cent emergence from 0-3 cm layer.The highest grain yield was obtained in two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 DAS and was at par with Isoproturon 1.0 kg ha-1 + Metsulfuron methyl 4 g ha-1 at 30 DAS and Clodinafop – Propargyl 60 g ha-1 at 30 DAS fb. Metsulfuron methyl 4 g ha-1 at 37 DAS. Zero tillage resulted in significantly higher uptake of NPK by wheat plants as compared to conventional tillage, whereas reduced tillage recorded minimum NPK, which was significantly lower over the other treatments of wheat establishment methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phalaris minor accounted for 55.0 per cent of weeds at 60 DAS.

Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
Phalaris minor was the most dominant weede0
Value
55.0 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phalaris minor was the most dominant weed at 60 DAS contributed 55.0 per cent of total weed population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF WHEAT IN RICE-WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melilotusindica accounted for 11 per cent of the wheat weed population.

Interactor
Melilotusindicae0weed
Outcome
Melilotusindica was the major non grassy weedse0
Value
11 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Melilotusindica was the major non grassy weeds in wheat which contributed 11 per cent to total weed population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage significantly reduced Phalaris minor density versus conventional tillage.

Treatment
zero tillagee0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
Phalaris minor densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
conventionally tilled wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing of wheat with zero tillage significantly reduced the Phalaris minor density as compared to conventionally tilled wheat after transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In reduced and conventional tillage, 60 per cent of Phalaris minor emerged from 0-3 cm.

Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
Phalaris minor emergede0
Value
60 per cente0
Qualifier
0-3 cm in reduced and conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“60 per cent Phalaris minor emerged from 0-3 cm in reduced and conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF WHEAT IN RICE-WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under zero tillage after transplanted rice, 55 per cent of Phalaris minor emerged from 0-3 cm.

Treatment
zero tillagee0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore1weed
Outcome
emergencee0
Value
55 per cente0
Qualifier
0-3 cm layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in zero tillage after transplanted rice there was 55 per cent emergence from 0-3 cm layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phalaris minor emerged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF WHEAT IN RICE-WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings produced the highest wheat grain yield.

Treatment
two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 DASe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was obtained in two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF WHEAT IN RICE-WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield with two hand weedings was at par with Isoproturon plus Metsulfuron methyl.

Treatment
two hand weedingse1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
Isoproturon 1.0 kg ha-1 + Metsulfuron methyl 4 g ha-1 at 30 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was at par with Isoproturon 1.0 kg ha-1 + Metsulfuron methyl 4 g ha-1 at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1099 · show in text ↑
e1

“two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1015 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF WHEAT IN RICE-WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield with two hand weedings was at par with sequential Clodinafop–Propargyl and Metsulfuron methyl.

Treatment
two hand weedingse1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
Clodinafop – Propargyl 60 g ha-1 at 30 DAS fb. Metsulfuron methyl 4 g ha-1 at 37 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop – Propargyl 60 g ha-1 at 30 DAS fb. Metsulfuron methyl 4 g ha-1 at 37 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“two hand weedings done at 30 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1015 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–959 · show in text ↑
e3

“was at par with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF WHEAT IN RICE-WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage significantly increased NPK uptake by wheat over conventional tillage.

Treatment
Zero tillagee0
Outcome
uptake of NPKe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zero tillage resulted in significantly higher uptake of NPK by wheat plants as compared to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage gave the lowest NPK uptake, significantly below other establishment methods.

Treatment
reduced tillagee0
Outcome
NPKe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatments of wheat establishment methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced tillage recorded minimum NPK, which was significantly lower over the other treatments of wheat establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1435 · show in text ↑

tillage · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.