Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Production

Response of Sweet Potato Plants to Mineral and Bio-Fertilization

H. Abdel-Naby; E. Fathy; Samar Doklega; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out during the two successive summer seasons of 2016 and 2017 at a private farm near Kafr saad center, Damietta Governorate, Egypt to study the impact of NPK fertilization at (100%, 50% and 0% NPK of the recommended doses) and some bio-stimulants (without, effective microorganisms (EM) 2ml/L, microbial mixture 1L/20L, yeast extract 10g/L and seaweed extract 1g/L) as well as their interaction on yield and its components and quality parameters of sweet potato plants Abees cultiver. Obtained results showed that increasing NPK fertilization levels from 0% to 100% of the recommended doses gave significant increments in total yield/fed, dry matter and quality parameters i.e. crude protein (%), total carbohydrates (%), starch%, total sugar %, beta-carotene and vitamin-C (vit.c) in tuberous roots of sweet potato in the two seasons. All bio-stimulants treatments increased significantly of all the previous mentioned parameters and decreased nitrate and nitrite contents in tuberous roots compared with untreated plants, EM gave the best values of all studied parameters. Doses 100 % and 50 % NPK plus EM gave the best significant increases in the studied parameters in both seasons and the interaction between 0% NPK plus EM decreased significantly nitrate and nitrite contents in the both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NPK from 0% to 100% of the recommended dose significantly increased total yield and dry matter of sweet potato.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
increasing NPK fertilization levels from 0% to 100% of the recommended dosese1
Outcome
total yield/fed, dry mattere1
Direction
incrementse1
Comparator
0%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing NPK fertilization levels from 0% to 100% of the recommended doses gave significant increments in total yield/fed, dry matter and quality parameters i.e. crude protein (%), total carbohydrates (%), starch%, total sugar %, beta-carotene and vitamin-C (vit.c) in tuberous roots of sweet potato in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NPK from 0% to 100% significantly increased crude protein, total carbohydrates and starch in sweet potato tuberous roots.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
increasing NPK fertilization levels from 0% to 100% of the recommended dosese1
Outcome
crude protein (%), total carbohydrates (%), starch%e1
Direction
incrementse1
Comparator
0%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing NPK fertilization levels from 0% to 100% of the recommended doses gave significant increments in total yield/fed, dry matter and quality parameters i.e. crude protein (%), total carbohydrates (%), starch%, total sugar %, beta-carotene and vitamin-C (vit.c) in tuberous roots of sweet potato in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NPK from 0% to 100% significantly increased total sugar, beta-carotene and vitamin C in sweet potato tuberous roots.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
increasing NPK fertilization levels from 0% to 100% of the recommended dosese1
Outcome
total sugar %, beta-carotene and vitamin-C (vit.c)e1
Direction
incrementse1
Comparator
0%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing NPK fertilization levels from 0% to 100% of the recommended doses gave significant increments in total yield/fed, dry matter and quality parameters i.e. crude protein (%), total carbohydrates (%), starch%, total sugar %, beta-carotene and vitamin-C (vit.c) in tuberous roots of sweet potato in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All bio-stimulant treatments significantly increased yield, dry matter and quality parameters of sweet potato relative to untreated plants.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
bio-stimulantse2
Outcome
all the previous mentioned parameterse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e2

“All bio-stimulants treatments increased significantly of all the previous mentioned parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All bio-stimulant treatments decreased nitrate and nitrite contents in sweet potato tuberous roots compared with untreated plants.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Organ / stage
tuberous rootse3
Outcome
nitrate and nitrite contentse3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
untreated plantse3

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e3

“decreased nitrate and nitrite contents in tuberous roots compared with untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective microorganisms (EM) gave the best values of all studied parameters in sweet potato.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
EMe4
Outcome
best values of all studied parameterse4
Direction
best valuese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e4

“EM gave the best values of all studied parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% NPK plus EM gave the best significant increases in the studied parameters of sweet potato in both seasons.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
100 %e5
Outcome
studied parameterse5
Direction
best significant increasese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e5

“Doses 100 % and 50 % NPK plus EM gave the best significant increases in the studied parameters in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% NPK plus EM gave the best significant increases in the studied parameters of sweet potato in both seasons.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
50 % NPK plus EMe5
Outcome
studied parameterse5
Direction
best significant increasese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e5

“Doses 100 % and 50 % NPK plus EM gave the best significant increases in the studied parameters in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of 0% NPK plus EM significantly decreased nitrate and nitrite contents of sweet potato in both seasons.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
0% NPK plus EMe6
Outcome
nitrate and nitrite contentse6
Direction
decreased significantlye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
e6

“the interaction between 0% NPK plus EM decreased significantly nitrate and nitrite contents in the both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1336 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 126 positive, 19 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.