Paper · 2019 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Evaluation of Streptomyces spp. and Bacillus spp. for biocontrol of Fusarium wilt in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

B. G. Anusha; S. Gopalakrishnan; M. K. Naik; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was carried out to test direct and indirect antagonistic effect against Fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri (FOC), and plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits of bacteria isolated from rhizosphere soils of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). A total of 40 bacterial isolates were tested for their antagonistic activity against FOC and of which 10 were found to have strong antagonistic potential. These were found to be Streptomyces spp. (five isolates) and Bacillus spp. (five isolates) in the morphological and biochemical characterisation and 16S rDNA analysis. Under both greenhouse and wilt sick field conditions, the selected Streptomyces and Bacillus isolates reduced disease incidence and delayed expression of symptoms of disease, over the non-inoculated control. The PGP ability of the isolates such as nodule number, nodule weight, shoot weight, root weight, grain yield and stover yield were also demonstrated under greenhouse and field conditions over the non-inoculated control. Among the ten isolates, Streptomyces sp. AC-19 and Bacillus sp. BS-20 were found to have more potential for biocontrol of FOC and PGP in chickpea. This investigation indicates that the selected Streptomyces and Bacillus isolates have the potential to control Fusarium wilt disease and to promote plant growth in chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten of forty bacterial isolates strongly antagonized FOC.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceriFusarium oxysporume2pathogen
Outcome
antagonistic activity against FOCe0
Value
10e0
Qualifier
40 bacterial isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 40 bacterial isolates were tested for their antagonistic activity against FOC and of which 10 were found to have strong antagonistic potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–416 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–261 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five antagonistic isolates were identified as Streptomyces species.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Interactor
Streptomyces spp.Streptomycese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Streptomyces spp.e0
Value
five isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces
Streptomyces · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These were found to be Streptomyces spp. (five isolates) and Bacillus spp. (five isolates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–508 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five antagonistic isolates were identified as Bacillus species.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Bacillus spp.e0
Value
five isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These were found to be Streptomyces spp. (five isolates) and Bacillus spp. (five isolates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–508 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected Streptomyces isolates reduced chickpea wilt incidence and delayed symptoms versus non-inoculated controls.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
selected Streptomycese0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceriFusarium oxysporume2pathogen
Second interactor
StreptomycesStreptomycese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence and delayed expression of symptoms of diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle0
Setting
greenhouse and wilt sick field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces
Streptomyces · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under both greenhouse and wilt sick field conditions, the selected Streptomyces and Bacillus isolates reduced disease incidence and delayed expression of symptoms of disease, over the non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–792 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–261 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected Bacillus isolates reduced chickpea wilt incidence and delayed symptoms versus non-inoculated controls.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Bacillus isolatese0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceriFusarium oxysporume2pathogen
Second interactor
Bacilluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence and delayed expression of symptoms of diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle0
Setting
greenhouse and wilt sick field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under both greenhouse and wilt sick field conditions, the selected Streptomyces and Bacillus isolates reduced disease incidence and delayed expression of symptoms of disease, over the non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–792 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–261 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces and Bacillus isolates improved chickpea nodulation, biomass and yield versus controls.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
selected Streptomyces and Bacillus isolatese2
Outcome
nodule number, nodule weight, shoot weighte0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle0
Setting
greenhouse and field conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PGP ability of the isolates such as nodule number, nodule weight, shoot weight, root weight, grain yield and stover yield were also demonstrated under greenhouse and field conditions over the non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–1012 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–261 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under both greenhouse and wilt sick field conditions, the selected Streptomyces and Bacillus isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–687 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces sp. AC-19 was identified as having greater biocontrol and plant growth promotion potential.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
Streptomyces sp. AC-19e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
potential for biocontrol of FOC and PGPe0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Streptomyces sp. AC-19 and Bacillus sp. BS-20 were found to have more potential for biocontrol of FOC and PGP in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1159 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus sp. BS-20 was identified as having greater biocontrol and plant growth promotion potential.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
Bacillus sp. BS-20e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
potential for biocontrol of FOC and PGPe0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Streptomyces sp. AC-19 and Bacillus sp. BS-20 were found to have more potential for biocontrol of FOC and PGP in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1159 · show in text ↑

Streptomyces · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.