Paper · 2019 · Photosynthetica

Differential response of growth and photosynthesis in diverse cotton genotypes under hypoxia stress

R. PAN; W. JIANG; Q. WANG; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The objectives of the present study were to compare the dynamic of the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of cotton varieties contrasting in waterlogging (WL) tolerance when subjected to hypoxia stress. The growth of the WL-sensitive genotypes was notably inhibited by WL, mainly as a result of a significant reduction in the net photosynthesis (PN) after two days of hypoxia treatment; in the tolerant varieties, no significant changes in PN were observed until 8 d after hypoxia onset. The intercellular CO2 concentration and maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII significantly declined, and the nonphotochemical quenching increased in the sensitive varieties. Infrared thermography showed that a low stomatal conductance resulted in an increased leaf temperature under hypoxia stress. Spectral image analysis suggested that the pigment content and water content rapidly decreased in the leaves of the sensitive varieties. It is concluded that maintaining stomatal opening through the interaction of ethylene and abscisic acid may be an important strategy to improve waterlogging tolerance in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging inhibited growth of sensitive cotton genotypes.

Material
WL-sensitive genotypese0
Treatment
WLe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of the WL-sensitive genotypes was notably inhibited by WL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After two days of hypoxia, net photosynthesis fell significantly in sensitive genotypes.

Treatment
hypoxia treatmente0
Outcome
net photosynthesis (PN)e0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
after two dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant reduction in the net photosynthesis (PN) after two days of hypoxia treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant genotypes showed no significant PN change until day eight.

Material
tolerant varietiese0
Treatment
hypoxiae0
Outcome
PNe0
Direction
no significant changese0
Qualifier
until 8 d after hypoxia onsete0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the tolerant varieties, no significant changes in PN were observed until 8 d after hypoxia onset.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypoxia lowered intercellular CO2 concentration in sensitive varieties.

Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
hypoxia stresst0
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentratione0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercellular CO2 concentration and maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII significantly declined, and the nonphotochemical quenching increased in the sensitive varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton genotypes under hypoxia stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximal PSII photochemical efficiency declined significantly in sensitive varieties.

Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
hypoxia stresst0
Outcome
maximal photochemical efficiency of PSIIe0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercellular CO2 concentration and maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII significantly declined, and the nonphotochemical quenching increased in the sensitive varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton genotypes under hypoxia stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonphotochemical quenching increased in sensitive varieties.

Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
hypoxia stresst0
Outcome
nonphotochemical quenchinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nonphotochemical quenching increased in the sensitive varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton genotypes under hypoxia stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–99 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low stomatal conductance under hypoxia increased leaf temperature.

Treatment
hypoxia stresse0
Outcome
leaf temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
a low stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a low stomatal conductance resulted in an increased leaf temperature under hypoxia stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigment content declined rapidly in leaves of sensitive varieties.

Material
sensitive varietiese0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
pigment contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pigment content and water content rapidly decreased in the leaves of the sensitive varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water content declined rapidly in leaves of sensitive varieties.

Material
sensitive varietiese0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
water contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pigment content and water content rapidly decreased in the leaves of the sensitive varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose maintaining stomatal opening through ethylene–abscisic acid interaction to improve waterlogging tolerance.

Compound
ethylene and abscisic acide0
Outcome
maintaining stomatal openinge0
Qualifier
may be an important strategy to improve waterlogging tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintaining stomatal opening through the interaction of ethylene and abscisic acid may be an important strategy to improve waterlogging tolerance in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1112 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

25 papers: 5 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

flooding · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 2 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.