Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal the potential mechanism of waterlogging resistance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Anane Gideon Owusu; Yin-Ping Lv; Man Liu; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
28
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) is susceptible to long-term waterlogging stress; however, genomic information of cotton response mechanisms toward long days of waterlogging is quite elusive. Methods Here, we combined the transcriptome and metabolome expression level changes in cotton roots after 10 and 20 days of waterlogging stress treatment pertaining to potential resistance mechanisms in two cotton genotypes. Results and discussion Numerous adventitious roots and hypertrophic lenticels were induced in CJ1831056 and CJ1831072. Transcriptome analysis revealed 101,599 differentially expressed genes in cotton roots with higher gene expression after 20 days of stress. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generating genes, antioxidant enzyme genes, and transcription factor genes ( AP2 , MYB , WRKY , and bZIP ) were highly responsive to waterlogging stress among the two genotypes. Metabolomics results showed higher expressions of stress-resistant metabolites sinapyl alcohol, L-glutamic acid, galactaric acid, glucose 1-phosphate, L-valine, L-asparagine, and melibiose in CJ1831056 than CJ1831072. Differentially expressed metabolites (adenosine, galactaric acid, sinapyl alcohol, L-valine, L-asparagine, and melibiose) significantly correlated with the differentially expressed PRX52 , PER1 , PER64 , and BGLU11 transcripts. This investigation reveals genes for targeted genetic engineering to improve waterlogging stress resistance to enhance abiotic stress regulatory mechanisms in cotton at the transcript and metabolic levels of study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging induced numerous adventitious roots and hypertrophic lenticels in both genotypes.

Material
CJ1831056e0
Treatment
waterlogging stresse1
Outcome
adventitious roots and hypertrophic lenticelse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Numerous adventitious roots and hypertrophic lenticels were induced in CJ1831056 and CJ1831072”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“waterlogging stress treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–357 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton roots had 101,599 differentially expressed genes, with higher expression after 20 days of stress.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
differentially expressed genese0
Direction
highere0
Value
101,599e0
Qualifier
after 20 days of stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transcriptome analysis revealed 101,599 differentially expressed genes in cotton roots with higher gene expression after 20 days of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–686 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ROS generating, antioxidant enzyme and AP2, MYB, WRKY and bZIP transcription factor genes were highly responsive to waterlogging in both genotypes.

Gene
transcription factor genese0
Outcome
highly responsive to waterlogging stresse0
Qualifier
the two genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generating genes, antioxidant enzyme genes, and transcription factor genes ( AP2 , MYB , WRKY , and bZIP ) were highly responsive to waterlogging stress among the two genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CJ1831056 had higher expression of sinapyl alcohol, L-glutamic acid and galactaric acid than CJ1831072.

Material
CJ1831056e0
Outcome
sinapyl alcohol, L-glutamic acid, galactaric acide0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CJ1831072e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metabolomics results showed higher expressions of stress-resistant metabolites sinapyl alcohol, L-glutamic acid, galactaric acid, glucose 1-phosphate, L-valine, L-asparagine, and melibiose in CJ1831056 than CJ1831072”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CJ1831056 had higher expression of glucose 1-phosphate, L-valine and L-asparagine than CJ1831072.

Material
CJ1831056e0
Outcome
glucose 1-phosphate, L-valine, L-asparaginee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CJ1831072e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metabolomics results showed higher expressions of stress-resistant metabolites sinapyl alcohol, L-glutamic acid, galactaric acid, glucose 1-phosphate, L-valine, L-asparagine, and melibiose in CJ1831056 than CJ1831072”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CJ1831056 had higher melibiose expression than CJ1831072.

Material
CJ1831056e0
Outcome
melibiosee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CJ1831072e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metabolomics results showed higher expressions of stress-resistant metabolites sinapyl alcohol, L-glutamic acid, galactaric acid, glucose 1-phosphate, L-valine, L-asparagine, and melibiose in CJ1831056 than CJ1831072”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six differential metabolites significantly correlated with PRX52, PER1, PER64 and BGLU11 transcripts.

Gene
PRX52e0
Outcome
Differentially expressed metabolitese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differentially expressed metabolites (adenosine, galactaric acid, sinapyl alcohol, L-valine, L-asparagine, and melibiose) significantly correlated with the differentially expressed PRX52 , PER1 , PER64 , and BGLU11 transcripts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–131 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

25 papers: 5 positive, 20 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.