Paper · 2019 · Revista CERES

Phytotoxicity of imazapyr+imazapic on tolerant rice varieties Guri INTA CL and IRGA 424 RI

Maurício Limberger de Oliveira; Enio Marchesan; Camille Flores Soares; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rice varieties from the Clearfield® system may present different tolerance levels to imidazolinone herbicides in function of application rate. The objective of this research was to evaluate the phytotoxicity of different rates of the formulated mixture of the herbicides imazapyr+imazapic applied on two tolerant irrigated rice varieties. The experiment was carried out in 2015/16 and 2016/17 growing seasons. A randomized complete block design was used in a factorial 2x6 with five replications. The factor A was composed by the tolerant rice varieties Guri INTA CL and IRGA 424 RI, and the factor B by rates of the formulated mixture of the herbicides imazapyr+imazapic (525+175 g a.i. kg-1) of 0, 140, 210, 280, 350, and 420 g c.p. ha-1. In the first growing season, it was observed maximum phytotoxicity of 8.5% while in the second the highest percentage was 13%. The number of stems m-2, plant height, shoot dry matter, SPAD index, and grain yield were not influenced (p≥0.05) by herbicide rates. The application of the formulated mixture of the herbicides imazapyr+imazapic causes low initial phytotoxicity to the tolerant rice varieties Guri INTA CL and IRGA 424 RI up to three times the recommended rate, not influencing their grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum rice phytotoxicity was 8.5% in the first growing season.

Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.5%e0
Qualifier
first growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first growing season, it was observed maximum phytotoxicity of 8.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“tolerant rice varieties Guri INTA CL and IRGA 424 RI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum rice phytotoxicity was 13% in the second growing season.

Outcome
Phytotoxicityt0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
in the seconde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while in the second the highest percentage was 13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytotoxicity of imazapyr+imazapic on tolerant rice varieties Guri INTA CL and IRGA 424 RI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide rates did not significantly influence rice stem number, height or shoot dry matter.

Treatment
herbicide ratese0
Outcome
number of stems m-2, plant height, shoot dry mattere0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of stems m-2, plant height, shoot dry matter, SPAD index, and grain yield were not influenced (p≥0.05) by herbicide rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide rates did not significantly influence rice SPAD index or grain yield.

Treatment
herbicide ratese0
Outcome
SPAD index, and grain yielde0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of stems m-2, plant height, shoot dry matter, SPAD index, and grain yield were not influenced (p≥0.05) by herbicide rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture caused low initial phytotoxicity in tolerant rice varieties up to three times the recommended rate.

Material
Guri INTA CLe0
Treatment
formulated mixture of the herbicides imazapyr+imazapice0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
up to three times the recommended ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the formulated mixture of the herbicides imazapyr+imazapic causes low initial phytotoxicity to the tolerant rice varieties Guri INTA CL and IRGA 424 RI up to three times the recommended rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1211 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

123 papers: 92 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 92 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

herbicide · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 10 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.