Paper · 2019 · UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)

The effect of Vigna unguiculata mulching on growth and yield performance of aerobic rice (AERON 1) / Hamdiyana Hamdan

Hamdiyana Hamdan

8
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This research was carried out to evaluate the effect of mulching application on growth and yield performance of an aerobic rice at the greenhouse Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Melaka Campus Jasin. The objectives of this study is to study the effectiveness of Vigna unguiculata mulching on yield and growth performance of aerobic rice. There were 2 treatments along with 5 replications were used in this experiment. The treatment consist of Vigna unguiculata mulching, and no mulching (control) and each of it consist five replications. Each of aerobic rice were planted in a single pot and each pot were applied 20 gram of mulching which act as a treatments. AERON1 variety was chosen in this experiment because of rapid growth and this experiment was conducted for 100 days. Vigna unguiculata mulching has the highest mean number for plant height (116.37cm), number of tiller (9.55), and plant biomass (83.108g). The aerobic rice plant that consist of mulching has better result in growth performance for all parameter included plant height (P=0.004), number of tillers (P=0.004), and also plant biomass (P=0.002). As for yield, the number of panicle, grain weight, and % of empty grain have the highest mean for the treatment with mulching. The % of fill grain has the highest mean for treatment without mulching. The result showed that all yield parameter analysis have no significant different, which the number of panicle (P=0.083), grain weight (P=0.127), and % of empty and filled grain (P=0.597). Lastly, mulching application was effective and showed it had significant different on growth performance, but on yield performance there was no significant. The application of mulching can be used by farmer as it would give benefit in terms enhancing the plant growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigna unguiculata mulch gave rice a mean height of 116.37cm and significantly improved height.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Material
AERON 1t0
Treatment
Vigna unguiculata mulchinge0
Interactor
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
116.37cme0
Comparator
no mulching (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice (AERON 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vigna unguiculata mulching has the highest mean number for plant height (116.37cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–862 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height (P=0.004)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1055 · show in text ↑
e2

“no mulching (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigna mulch produced 9.55 tillers and significantly improved tiller number.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Material
AERON 1t0
Treatment
Vigna unguiculata mulchinge0
Interactor
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
number of tillere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.55e0
Comparator
no mulching (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice (AERON 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vigna unguiculata mulching has the highest mean number for plant height (116.37cm), number of tiller (9.55)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of tillers (P=0.004)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1084 · show in text ↑
e2

“no mulching (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigna mulch produced 83.108g plant biomass and significantly improved biomass.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Material
AERON 1t0
Treatment
Vigna unguiculata mulchinge0
Interactor
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
83.108ge0
Comparator
no mulching (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice (AERON 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vigna unguiculata mulching has the highest mean number for plant height (116.37cm), number of tiller (9.55), and plant biomass (83.108g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant biomass (P=0.002)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“no mulching (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched rice had the highest mean panicle number, without a significant yield difference.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Vigna unguiculata mulchinge2
Outcome
number of paniclee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
no mulching (control)e2

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice (AERON 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of panicle, grain weight, and % of empty grain have the highest mean for the treatment with mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of panicle (P=0.083)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1440 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vigna unguiculata mulching, and no mulching (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched rice had the highest mean grain weight, without a significant yield difference.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Vigna unguiculata mulchinge2
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
no mulching (control)e2

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice (AERON 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of panicle, grain weight, and % of empty grain have the highest mean for the treatment with mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain weight (P=0.127)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1464 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vigna unguiculata mulching, and no mulching (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched rice had the highest mean empty grain percentage, without a significant difference.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Vigna unguiculata mulchinge2
Outcome
% of empty graine0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
no mulching (control)e2

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice (AERON 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“% of empty grain have the highest mean for the treatment with mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“% of empty and filled grain (P=0.597)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1507 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vigna unguiculata mulching, and no mulching (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Unmulched rice had the highest mean filled grain percentage, without a significant difference.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
no mulching (control)e2
Outcome
% of fill graine0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Vigna unguiculata mulchinge2

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice (AERON 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“% of fill grain has the highest mean for treatment without mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“% of empty and filled grain (P=0.597)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1507 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vigna unguiculata mulching, and no mulching (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–497 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend mulch application for improving plant growth and yield.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Outcome
enhancing the plant growth and yielde0

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice (AERON 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of mulching can be used by farmer as it would give benefit in terms enhancing the plant growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1786 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 50 positive, 3 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Mulching reduced rice yield by 43% in one of four comparisons with burning.

    Effect of residue management and fallow length on weeds and rice yield · 1998 · compared with farmers' traditional burning of crop and weed residues

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

mulching · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 34 positive, 12 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.