Paper · 1976 · Weed Science

Preplanting Applications of Dinitroanilines in Cotton

K. C. Hamilton; H. F. Arle

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two incorporation methods were used in applying eight dinitroaniline herbicides before planting cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) for 3 yr. Penoxalin [ N -(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] gave the best stands of cotton. Nitralin [ 4 -(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropylaniline] and dinitramine ( N 4 , N 4 -diethyl- a,a,a -trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine) resulted in the poorest stands. In 2 of 3 yr, cotton stands were better where herbicides were incorporated by listing only rather than by disking before listing. The eight herbicides were equally effective in annual grass control when followed by postemergence applications of diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea]. An-56477 [ N,N -bis(2-chloroethyl)-4-methyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] was least effective in controlling annual broadleaf weeds. In 1972, cotton yield was reduced when An-56477 was incorporated by disking. In the average cotton yields for six tests, An-56477 produced significantly lower yields than any other herbicide except butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl- N -(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine]. No differences in cotton fiber properties or boll components were due to herbicides or method of application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxalin gave the best cotton stands.

Treatment
Penoxaline0
Outcome
stands of cottone0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxalin [ N -(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] gave the best stands of cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitralin gave among the poorest cotton stands.

Treatment
Nitraline0
Outcome
standse0
Direction
pooreste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitralin [ 4 -(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropylaniline] and dinitramine ( N 4 , N 4 -diethyl- a,a,a -trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine) resulted in the poorest stands.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinitramine gave among the poorest cotton stands.

Treatment
dinitraminee0
Outcome
standse0
Direction
pooreste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitralin [ 4 -(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropylaniline] and dinitramine ( N 4 , N 4 -diethyl- a,a,a -trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine) resulted in the poorest stands.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Listing only produced better cotton stands than disking before listing in two of three years.

Treatment
listing onlye0
Outcome
cotton standse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
2 of 3 yre0
Comparator
disking before listinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2 of 3 yr, cotton stands were better where herbicides were incorporated by listing only rather than by disking before listing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All eight herbicides controlled annual grass equally when followed by diuron.

Treatment
eight herbicidese0
Interactor
annual grasse0weed
Outcome
annual grass controle0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Comparator
equallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The eight herbicides were equally effective in annual grass control when followed by postemergence applications of diuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An-56477 was least effective against annual broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
An-56477e0
Interactor
annual broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling annual broadleaf weedse0
Direction
least effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An-56477 [ N,N -bis(2-chloroethyl)-4-methyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] was least effective in controlling annual broadleaf weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disk incorporation of An-56477 reduced cotton yield in 1972.

Treatment
An-56477 was incorporated by diskinge0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
In 1972e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1972, cotton yield was reduced when An-56477 was incorporated by disking.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

An-56477 produced lower average cotton yields than other herbicides except butralin.

Treatment
An-56477e0
Outcome
cotton yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
six testse0
Comparator
any other herbicide except butraline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the average cotton yields for six tests, An-56477 produced significantly lower yields than any other herbicide except butralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides and application method caused no reported differences in cotton fiber properties or boll components.

Treatment
herbicides or method of applicatione0
Outcome
cotton fiber properties or boll componentse0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in cotton fiber properties or boll components were due to herbicides or method of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 10 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Fluometuron PRE increased cotton lint yield.

    Weed management with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and prometryn in cotton · 2002 · compared with systems that did not use fluometuron PRE

    Opposite direction

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

herbicide · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 57 positive, 11 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.