Paper · 2019 · Revista Caatinga

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT WATER CONDITIONS ON RICE GROWTH AT THE SEEDLING STAGE

JUN ZHANG; YANYAN LI; HAOYU ZAHNG; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Water scarcity has led to the adoption of water-saving irrigation technology around the world. Drip-irrigation has been used for rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation in Xinjiang, China. Researchers reported 12.0 t/ha yield; however, drip-irrigated rice produces around 6-8 t/ha in practice, and it is clear that water deficiency explains this gap. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to compare the growth, photosynthetic characteristics, and antioxidant activity of rice grown in nutrient solutions with water potentials of 0.00, -0.02, -0.05, and -0.09 MPa [0, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5% polyethylene glycol (PEG), respectively], to determine the optimal water conditions for drip-irrigated rice. There was no significant difference between the 0, 2.5, and 5.0% PEG treatments for relative growth rate and relative water content after 10 and 20 days. However, 2.5 and 5.0% PEG treatments substantially affected the photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant enzyme activity after 10 and 20 days. Treatment with 7.5% PEG inhibited shoot growth. There was a significant reduction in antioxidant enzyme activity. Water-saving rice cultivation, such as drip-irrigated rice, suffered mild drought stress at -0.02 to -0.05 Mpa, but this did not inhibit growth. The amount of irrigation should be increased to obtain higher rice yields under drip-irrigation conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate did not differ significantly among 0, 2.5 and 5.0% PEG after 10 and 20 days.

Treatment
2.5, and 5.0% PEG treatmentse0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
after 10 and 20 dayse0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between the 0, 2.5, and 5.0% PEG treatments for relative growth rate and relative water content after 10 and 20 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content did not differ significantly among 0, 2.5 and 5.0% PEG after 10 and 20 days.

Treatment
2.5, and 5.0% PEG treatmentse0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
after 10 and 20 dayse0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between the 0, 2.5, and 5.0% PEG treatments for relative growth rate and relative water content after 10 and 20 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2.5% PEG substantially affected photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant enzyme activity.

Treatment
2.5e0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Qualifier
after 10 and 20 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, 2.5 and 5.0% PEG treatments substantially affected the photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant enzyme activity after 10 and 20 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

5.0% PEG substantially affected photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant enzyme activity.

Treatment
5.0% PEG treatmentse0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Qualifier
after 10 and 20 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, 2.5 and 5.0% PEG treatments substantially affected the photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant enzyme activity after 10 and 20 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

7.5% PEG inhibited shoot growth.

Treatment
7.5% PEGe0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 7.5% PEG inhibited shoot growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activity was significantly reduced.

Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant reduction in antioxidant enzyme activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend increasing irrigation to obtain higher rice yields under drip irrigation.

Outcome
amount of irrigation should be increasede0
Qualifier
higher rice yields under drip-irrigation conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of irrigation should be increased to obtain higher rice yields under drip-irrigation conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1372 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene glycol) · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

poly(ethylene glycol) · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 9 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.