Paper · 1972 · Weed Science

Tolerance of Soybean Cultivars to Weed Competition and Herbicides

O. C. Burnside

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The competitiveness of 10 soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars to weeds, their tolerance to twice normal rates of commonly used soybean herbicides, and the soil residual properties of these herbicides were studied during 4 years at Lincoln, Nebraska. Three soybean cultivars showing the least percentage yield loss from weeds were ‘Harosoy 63′, ‘Amsoy’, and ‘Corsoy’; whereas cultivars showing the greatest yield loss were ‘Hawkeye 63′, ‘Shelby’, and ‘Lindarin 63′. The two herbicide treatments causing the greatest average soybean yield loss were 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea (linuron) at 4.5 kg/ha and α,α,α-trifluro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine (trifluralin) at 2.2 kg/ha. Cultivar selection was important in reducing soybean yield loss from herbicides as linuron at 4.5 kg/ha reduced yields 5% for ‘Harosoy 63’ to as much as 31% for ‘Ford’. ‘Neal’ oat (Avena saliva L.) yields showed 4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropylaniline (nitralin) to be the most persistent herbicide in soil in this study followed by trifluralin. Plowing the soil eliminated the phytotoxicity of nitralin and trifluralin to subsequently planted oats.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harosoy 63, Amsoy and Corsoy had the least percentage soybean yield loss from weeds.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
‘Harosoy 63′, ‘Amsoy’, and ‘Corsoy’e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
percentage yield loss from weedse0
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three soybean cultivars showing the least percentage yield loss from weeds were ‘Harosoy 63′, ‘Amsoy’, and ‘Corsoy’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–373 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hawkeye 63, Shelby and Lindarin 63 had the greatest soybean yield loss from weeds.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
‘Hawkeye 63′, ‘Shelby’, and ‘Lindarin 63′e0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars showing the greatest yield loss were ‘Hawkeye 63′, ‘Shelby’, and ‘Lindarin 63′”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield loss from weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron at 4.5 kg/ha caused one of the greatest average soybean yield losses.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
linuron) at 4.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
soybean yield losse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two herbicide treatments causing the greatest average soybean yield loss were 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea (linuron) at 4.5 kg/ha and α,α,α-trifluro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine (trifluralin) at 2.2 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin at 2.2 kg/ha caused one of the greatest average soybean yield losses.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
trifluralin) at 2.2 kg/hae0
Outcome
soybean yield losse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two herbicide treatments causing the greatest average soybean yield loss were 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea (linuron) at 4.5 kg/ha and α,α,α-trifluro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine (trifluralin) at 2.2 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron at 4.5 kg/ha reduced Harosoy 63 yield by 5%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
‘Harosoy 63’e0
Treatment
linuron at 4.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“linuron at 4.5 kg/ha reduced yields 5% for ‘Harosoy 63’ to as much as 31% for ‘Ford’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron at 4.5 kg/ha reduced Ford yield by as much as 31%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
‘Ford’e0
Treatment
linuron at 4.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“linuron at 4.5 kg/ha reduced yields 5% for ‘Harosoy 63’ to as much as 31% for ‘Ford’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitralin was the most persistent herbicide in soil according to Neal oat yields.

Material
‘Neal’e0
Treatment
nitraline0
Outcome
most persistent herbicide in soile0
Direction
most persistente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Neal’ oat (Avena saliva L.) yields showed 4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropylaniline (nitralin) to be the most persistent herbicide in soil in this study followed by trifluralin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing eliminated phytotoxicity from nitralin and trifluralin to subsequently planted oats.

Treatment
Plowing the soile0
Outcome
phytotoxicity of nitralin and trifluraline0
Direction
eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plowing the soil eliminated the phytotoxicity of nitralin and trifluralin to subsequently planted oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1174 · show in text ↑

linuron · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

trifluralin · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

24 papers: 11 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

tillage · crop injury · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.