Paper · 1979 · Weed Science

Efficacy and Rotational Crop Response to Levels and Dates of Dinitroaniline Herbicide Applications

J. R. Abernathy; J. W. Keeling

18
claims
32
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine), dinitramine ( N 4 , N 4 -diethyl-α,α,α-rifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), profluralin [ N -(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro 2,6-dinitro- N -propyl- p -toluidine], fluchloralin [ N -(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro- N -propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], pendimethalin [ N -(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)- N -(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], and USB 3153 ( N 3 , N 3 -di- N -propyl-2,4-dinitro-6-trifluoromethyl- m -phenylenediamine) were applied to evaluate weed control, cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′) tolerance, and effect on rotational crops. Each herbicide was applied at 1-month intervals for 6 months prior to planting at 1, 1.25, 1.5, and 2X the recommended rates. Pigweed ( Amaranthus hybridus L. and A. retroflexus L.) population counts and visual control ratings showed that weed control improved when treatments were applied closer to planting. Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control. Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control. USB 3153 at all rates and dates of application severely limited growth and yields of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘Funk 332′) planted after harvest and also the following May. Spring applications of profluralin at 1.5 and 2X rates and trifluralin at the 2X rate resulted in significant injury of rotational sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Dekalb E-59+’].

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide applications closer to planting improved pigweed control.

Treatment
treatments were applied closer to plantinge0
Interactor
Pigweede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigweed ( Amaranthus hybridus L. and A. retroflexus L.) population counts and visual control ratings showed that weed control improved when treatments were applied closer to planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1.25X profluralin in November or December was required for effective weed control.

Treatment
1.25X profluraline0
Outcome
effective weed controle0
Qualifier
November and Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1.5X trifluralin in November or December was required for effective weed control.

Treatment
1.5X trifluraline0
Outcome
effective weed controle0
Qualifier
November and Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fluchloralin in November or December was required for effective weed control.

Treatment
fluchloraline0
Outcome
effective weed controle0
Qualifier
November and Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pendimethalin in November or December was required for effective weed control.

Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
effective weed controle0
Qualifier
November and Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1X USB 3153 in November or December was required for effective weed control.

Treatment
1X USB 3153e0
Outcome
effective weed controle0
Qualifier
November and Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2X butralin in November or December was required for effective weed control.

Treatment
2X butraline0
Outcome
effective weed controle0
Qualifier
November and Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring profluralin application was required for adequate weed control.

Treatment
profluraline0
Outcome
adequate weed controle0
Qualifier
Spring applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring trifluralin application was required for adequate weed control.

Treatment
trifluraline0
Outcome
adequate weed controle0
Qualifier
Spring applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring fluchloralin application was required for adequate weed control.

Treatment
fluchloraline0
Outcome
adequate weed controle0
Qualifier
Spring applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring USB 3153 application was required for adequate weed control.

Treatment
USB 3153e0
Outcome
adequate weed controle0
Qualifier
Spring applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring pendimethalin application was required for adequate weed control.

Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
adequate weed controle0
Qualifier
Spring applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring dinitramine application was required for adequate weed control.

Treatment
dinitraminee0
Outcome
adequate weed controle0
Qualifier
Spring applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring butralin application was required for adequate weed control.

Treatment
butraline0
Outcome
adequate weed controle0
Qualifier
Spring applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USB 3153 severely limited rotational wheat growth.

Material
Funk 332′e0
Treatment
USB 3153e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
severely limitede0
Qualifier
all rates and dates of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“USB 3153 at all rates and dates of application severely limited growth and yields of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘Funk 332′) planted after harvest and also the following May.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USB 3153 severely limited rotational wheat yield.

Material
Funk 332′e0
Treatment
USB 3153e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
severely limitede0
Qualifier
all rates and dates of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“USB 3153 at all rates and dates of application severely limited growth and yields of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘Funk 332′) planted after harvest and also the following May.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring profluralin at 1.5 and 2X rates caused significant injury in rotational sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Material
Dekalb E-59+e0
Treatment
profluralin at 1.5 and 2X ratese0
Outcome
injury of rotational sorghume0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring applications of profluralin at 1.5 and 2X rates and trifluralin at the 2X rate resulted in significant injury of rotational sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Dekalb E-59+’].”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring trifluralin at the 2X rate caused significant injury in rotational sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Material
Dekalb E-59+e0
Treatment
trifluralin at the 2X ratee0
Outcome
injury of rotational sorghume0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring applications of profluralin at 1.5 and 2X rates and trifluralin at the 2X rate resulted in significant injury of rotational sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Dekalb E-59+’].”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1757 · show in text ↑

trifluralin · crop injury · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.