Paper · 1987 · Weed Science

Rice (Oryza sativa) Tolerance to Fenoxaprop

Charles E. Snipes; Joe E. Street

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted for 3 yr to evaluate the effects of the ethyl ester of fenoxaprop {(±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoxazolyl)oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid} on rice ( Oryza sativa L. 'Starbonnet′) applied at 112 and 168 g ai/ha or as two applications of 112 g ai/ha applied 10 to 14 days apart. Fenoxaprop did not adversely affect grain yield, panicle weight, seed weight, or seed germination when applied before the booting stage of both sprinkler-irrigated and flooded rice. Rice height was sometimes reduced by treatment at earlier growth stages, but yields were not affected. With the exception of applications at early jointing (internode elongation = 6 mm) in 1983, milling yield was not adversely affected by fenoxaprop applications made prior to booting of both sprinkler-irrigated and flood-culture rice. Applications during heading adversely affected most yield parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop before booting did not adversely affect grain yield, panicle weight and seed weight.

Organ / stage
before the booting stagee0
Treatment
Fenoxaprope0
Outcome
grain yield, panicle weight, seed weighte0
Direction
did not adversely affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fenoxaprop did not adversely affect grain yield, panicle weight, seed weight, or seed germination when applied before the booting stage of both sprinkler-irrigated and flooded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa) Tolerance to Fenoxaprop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop before booting did not adversely affect seed germination.

Treatment
Fenoxaprope0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
did not adversely affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fenoxaprop did not adversely affect grain yield, panicle weight, seed weight, or seed germination when applied before the booting stage of both sprinkler-irrigated and flooded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop sometimes reduced rice height at earlier growth stages.

Treatment
treatment at earlier growth stagese0
Outcome
Rice heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
sometimese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice height was sometimes reduced by treatment at earlier growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop before booting generally did not adversely affect milling yield, except at early jointing in 1983.

Treatment
fenoxaprop applications made prior to bootinge0
Outcome
milling yielde0
Direction
not adversely affectede0
Qualifier
exception of applications at early jointing (internode elongation = 6 mm) in 1983e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the exception of applications at early jointing (internode elongation = 6 mm) in 1983, milling yield was not adversely affected by fenoxaprop applications made prior to booting of both sprinkler-irrigated and flood-culture rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications during heading adversely affected most rice yield parameters.

Treatment
Applications during headinge0
Outcome
most yield parameterse0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications during heading adversely affected most yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa) Tolerance to Fenoxaprop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑

stage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 16 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.