Paper · 1983 · Weed Science

Effect of No-till Systems on Weed Control and Yields of Continuous Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Charles L. Cleary; Thomas F. Peeper

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted from 1979 to 1982 to determine whether selected herbicide treatments applied before or after harvest would provide adequate weed control without the use of tillage between crops in continuous winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production systems. of the herbicide treatments evaluated, only oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide) at 2.2 kg ai/ha applied prior to wheat maturity adequately controlled summer annual weeds each year. Populations of yellow nutsedge ( Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES) and/or clammy groundcherry ( Physalis heterophylla Nees) increased from continued preharvest use of oryzalin in no-till treatments and were greater than those resulting from conventional tillage or various postharvest no-till treatments containing glyphosate [ N -(phosphonomethyl)glycine]. After 4 yr, populations of winter annual Cruciferae spp. at one location were lower in treatments that had poorer control of summer annual weeds or volunteer wheat. At a second location, winter annual broadleaf species were more numerous in conventionally tilled than in no-till treatments. Wheat yields obtained with no-till treatments were lower than yields obtained with conventional tillage in seasons favorable for high yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest oryzalin at 2.2 kg ai/ha adequately controlled summer annual weeds each year.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide) at 2.2 kg ai/hae0
Interactor
summer annual weedse0weed
Outcome
summer annual weedse0
Direction
adequately controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide) at 2.2 kg ai/ha applied prior to wheat maturity adequately controlled summer annual weeds each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continued preharvest oryzalin increased yellow nutsedge populations relative to tillage or glyphosate no-till treatments.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
continued preharvest use of oryzalin in no-till treatmentse0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
Populations of yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional tillage or various postharvest no-till treatments containing glyphosatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations of yellow nutsedge ( Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES) and/or clammy groundcherry ( Physalis heterophylla Nees) increased from continued preharvest use of oryzalin in no-till treatments and were greater than those resulting from conventional tillage or various postharvest no-till treatments containing glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continued preharvest oryzalin increased clammy groundcherry populations relative to tillage or glyphosate no-till treatments.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
continued preharvest use of oryzalin in no-till treatmentse0
Interactor
clammy groundcherrye0weed
Outcome
clammy groundcherrye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional tillage or various postharvest no-till treatments containing glyphosatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations of yellow nutsedge ( Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES) and/or clammy groundcherry ( Physalis heterophylla Nees) increased from continued preharvest use of oryzalin in no-till treatments and were greater than those resulting from conventional tillage or various postharvest no-till treatments containing glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At one location after four years, poorer summer weed or volunteer wheat control coincided with fewer winter annual Cruciferae.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatments that had poorer control of summer annual weeds or volunteer wheate0
Interactor
winter annual Cruciferae spp.e0weed
Outcome
populations of winter annual Cruciferae spp.e0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
After 4 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 4 yr, populations of winter annual Cruciferae spp. at one location were lower in treatments that had poorer control of summer annual weeds or volunteer wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a second location, conventional tillage had more winter annual broadleaf weeds than no-till.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
conventionally tillede0
Interactor
winter annual broadleaf speciese0weed
Outcome
winter annual broadleaf speciese0
Direction
more numerouse0
Comparator
no-till treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At a second location, winter annual broadleaf species were more numerous in conventionally tilled than in no-till treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till wheat yields were lower than conventional tillage yields in high-yield seasons.

Treatment
no-till treatmentse0
Outcome
Wheat yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
seasons favorable for high yieldse0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields obtained with no-till treatments were lower than yields obtained with conventional tillage in seasons favorable for high yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1265 · show in text ↑

oryzalin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 28 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.