Paper · 2019 · Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi

Effect of Nano Technology in Combination with Soil Solarization to Control Panama Disease of Banana in Jordan Valley

Ahmad Mohamad ALMOMANY; Nida SALEM; Monther Mohumad TAHAT

16
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil solarization was applied for a field which was planted with infected banana seedlings. Spreading transparent plastic sheets of 80µ thickness was done from August, 1 until October 12, 2017 at the University Farm in Jordan Valley. Soil solarization was effective in elimination of all phytopathogenic propagules at 30 cm depth. Then clear plastic sheets were removed and the solarized land was planted with healthy banana seedlings cultivar Grand Naine. Banana plantlets were chemically treated as soil drench with Nanoparticle solution of 200 and 400 ppm of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs), two fungicides, Revanol and Tachigaren, Sodium Hypochlorite in addition of irrigation of one treatment with treated wastewater. Biological control included three treatments; Endomycorrhiza, Trichoderma as a commercial product (BioHealth) and plant growth promoting rhizo-bacteria. Fresh chicken and sheep manure was added to two treatments. Twelve treatments were distributed randomly in randomized complete block design. Endomycorrhizal inoculation with Glomus mosseae, 200 ppm of AgNPs, Revanol and Tachigaren treatments of banana seedlings were the most effective in completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilt during the whole experimental period. Several applications of Trichoderma, wastewater and 400 ppm of AgNPs were effective in maintaining some infected banana seedlings nine months after planting very healthy. Sheep and chicken manure treatments resulted with 60 and 40% disease incidence with Fusarium wilt respectively and 20% of disease incidence in Hypex, PGPR and control treatments. Wastewater, Nanoparticles 200 ppm and endomycorhizal treatments gave the highest ratio of sword sucker development. We recommend soil solarization and use of integrated program to control Panama disease of banana in Jordan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solarization eliminated all phytopathogenic propagules at 30 cm depth in the banana field.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
Soil solarizatione1
Outcome
elimination of all phytopathogenic propagulese1
Qualifier
30 cm depthe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Soil solarization was effective in elimination of all phytopathogenic propagules at 30 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endomycorrhizal inoculation with Glomus mosseae was among the most effective treatments, completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilt throughout the experiment.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
Endomycorrhizal inoculation with Glomus mosseaee1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Second interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilte1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Endomycorrhizal inoculation with Glomus mosseae, 200 ppm of AgNPs, Revanol and Tachigaren treatments of banana seedlings were the most effective in completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilt during the whole experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 ppm of AgNPs was among the most effective treatments, completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilt throughout the experiment.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
200 ppm of AgNPse1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilte1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Endomycorrhizal inoculation with Glomus mosseae, 200 ppm of AgNPs, Revanol and Tachigaren treatments of banana seedlings were the most effective in completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilt during the whole experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Revanol was among the most effective treatments, completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilt throughout the experiment.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
Revanole1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilte1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Endomycorrhizal inoculation with Glomus mosseae, 200 ppm of AgNPs, Revanol and Tachigaren treatments of banana seedlings were the most effective in completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilt during the whole experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tachigaren was among the most effective treatments, completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilt throughout the experiment.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
Tachigarene1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilte1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Endomycorrhizal inoculation with Glomus mosseae, 200 ppm of AgNPs, Revanol and Tachigaren treatments of banana seedlings were the most effective in completely protecting banana plants from Fusarium wilt during the whole experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several applications of Trichoderma were effective in keeping some infected banana seedlings very healthy nine months after planting.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
Trichodermae1
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
maintaining some infected banana seedlings nine months after planting very healthye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Several applications of Trichoderma, wastewater and 400 ppm of AgNPs were effective in maintaining some infected banana seedlings nine months after planting very healthy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several applications of wastewater were effective in keeping some infected banana seedlings very healthy nine months after planting.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
wastewatere1
Outcome
maintaining some infected banana seedlings nine months after planting very healthye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Several applications of Trichoderma, wastewater and 400 ppm of AgNPs were effective in maintaining some infected banana seedlings nine months after planting very healthy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several applications of 400 ppm of AgNPs were effective in keeping some infected banana seedlings very healthy nine months after planting.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
400 ppm of AgNPse1
Outcome
maintaining some infected banana seedlings nine months after planting very healthye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Several applications of Trichoderma, wastewater and 400 ppm of AgNPs were effective in maintaining some infected banana seedlings nine months after planting very healthy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheep manure treatment resulted in 60 disease incidence of Fusarium wilt in banana, higher than the 20% in the control.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
Sheepe1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
60e1
Qualifier
20% of disease incidence in Hypex, PGPR and control treatmentse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sheep and chicken manure treatments resulted with 60 and 40% disease incidence with Fusarium wilt respectively and 20% of disease incidence in Hypex, PGPR and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure treatment resulted in 40% disease incidence of Fusarium wilt in banana, higher than the 20% in the control.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
chicken manuree1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
40%e1
Qualifier
20% of disease incidence in Hypex, PGPR and control treatmentse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sheep and chicken manure treatments resulted with 60 and 40% disease incidence with Fusarium wilt respectively and 20% of disease incidence in Hypex, PGPR and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypex treatment showed 20% Fusarium wilt incidence in banana, the same as the control.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
Hypexe1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Value
20%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sheep and chicken manure treatments resulted with 60 and 40% disease incidence with Fusarium wilt respectively and 20% of disease incidence in Hypex, PGPR and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR treatment showed 20% Fusarium wilt incidence in banana, the same as the control.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
PGPRe1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Second interactor
PGPRe1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Value
20%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sheep and chicken manure treatments resulted with 60 and 40% disease incidence with Fusarium wilt respectively and 20% of disease incidence in Hypex, PGPR and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wastewater gave the highest ratio of sword sucker development in banana.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
Wastewatere1
Outcome
ratio of sword sucker developmente1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Wastewater, Nanoparticles 200 ppm and endomycorhizal treatments gave the highest ratio of sword sucker development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles 200 ppm gave the highest ratio of sword sucker development in banana.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
Nanoparticles 200 ppme1
Outcome
ratio of sword sucker developmente1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Wastewater, Nanoparticles 200 ppm and endomycorhizal treatments gave the highest ratio of sword sucker development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

endomycorhizal treatments gave the highest ratio of sword sucker development in banana.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
endomycorhizal treatmentse1
Outcome
ratio of sword sucker developmente1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Wastewater, Nanoparticles 200 ppm and endomycorhizal treatments gave the highest ratio of sword sucker development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend soil solarization and an integrated program to control Panama disease of banana in Jordan.

Taxon
bananae1
Outcome
control Panama disease of bananae1
Setting
Jordane1

Verbatim

e1

“We recommend soil solarization and use of integrated program to control Panama disease of banana in Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1827 · show in text ↑

silver nanoparticle · Fusarium · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · Fusarium · MusaPositive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium · MusaPositive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.