Paper · 1985 · Weed Science

Influence of Herbicides and Tillage on the Control of Triazine-Resistant Smooth Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) in Corn (Zea mays) and Soybeans (Glycine max)

Ronald L. Ritter; Thomas C. Harris; William J. Varano

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In field studies, a preemergence application of metolachlor [2-chloro- N -(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)- N -(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] followed by an early postemergence application of dicamba (3,6-dichloro- o -anisic acid) gave good season-long control of smooth pigweed ( Amaranthus hybridus L. ♯ AMACH) in conventional and no-till corn ( Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3184’ and ‘Pioneer 3382’). In soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams' and ‘Essex’], best control of smooth pigweed was achieved with an early postemergence application of sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethyoxy-imino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio) propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} plus acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid}. Tillage played a role in the degree of smooth pigweed control. Best control of smooth pigweed in corn was obtained when the ground was moldboard plowed and disced, and least control was obtained when corn was no-till planted in the previous year's corn stalks or in a rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor followed by dicamba gave good season-long smooth pigweed control in conventional and no-till corn.

Treatment
metolachlore0
Interactor
smooth pigweedAmaranthus hybriduse0weed
Outcome
control of smooth pigweede0
Direction
goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus hybridus
Amaranthus hybridus · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a preemergence application of metolachlor [2-chloro- N -(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)- N -(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] followed by an early postemergence application of dicamba (3,6-dichloro- o -anisic acid) gave good season-long control of smooth pigweed ( Amaranthus hybridus L. ♯ AMACH) in conventional and no-till corn ( Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3184’ and ‘Pioneer 3382’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sethoxydim plus acifluorfen gave the best smooth pigweed control in soybeans.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
sethoxydime0
Interactor
smooth pigweedAmaranthus hybriduse0weed
Outcome
control of smooth pigweede0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus hybridus
Amaranthus hybridus · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams' and ‘Essex’], best control of smooth pigweed was achieved with an early postemergence application of sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethyoxy-imino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio) propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} plus acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard plowing and discing gave the best smooth pigweed control in corn.

Treatment
moldboard plowed and discede0
Interactor
smooth pigweedAmaranthus hybriduse0weed
Outcome
control of smooth pigweede0
Direction
Beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus hybridus
Amaranthus hybridus · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Best control of smooth pigweed in corn was obtained when the ground was moldboard plowed and disced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till corn planted into previous corn stalks had the least smooth pigweed control.

Treatment
no-till planted in the previous year's corn stalkse0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“least control was obtained when corn was no-till planted in the previous year's corn stalks or in a rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till corn planted into a rye cover crop had the least smooth pigweed control.

Treatment
rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crope0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“least control was obtained when corn was no-till planted in the previous year's corn stalks or in a rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1019 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

metolachlor · Amaranthus hybridus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cover crop · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.