Paper · 2019 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Efficacy of 2,4-D Choline as Influenced by Weed Size in the Texas High Plains

Misha R. Manuchehri; Peter A. Dotray; J. Wayne Keeling

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aim: Postemergence timing trials based on weed size were conducted near Lubbock, TX to assess the effectiveness of 2,4-D choline + glyphosate on control of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.), Russian-thistle (Salsola tragus L.), and kochia (Kochia scoparia L.) at three growth stages (3 to 5 cm, 10 to 15 cm, and 20 to 30 cm). Study Design: All trials were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Place and Duration of Study: Field experiments were conducted in 2013, 2014, and 2015 in Lubbock, TX at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center near Lubbock, TX. Methodology: Herbicide treatments consisted of a single postemergence application of 2,4-D choline + glyphosate at two rates, 2,4-D choline + glyphosate at two rates + glufosinate, 2,4-D choline + glyphosate + S-metolachlor, 2,4-D choline + glyphosate + acetochlor, 2,4-D choline + glufosinate, glyphosate, or glufosinate. Results: The greatest level of weed control for all three weed species was achieved at the 3 to 5 cm timing; however, weed size was most critical for Palmer amaranth and Russian-thistle compared to kochia. Averaged over all three years, Palmer amaranth control decreased from 93 to 74% when evaluated 21 days after treatment following applications that included 2,4-D choline when applied to plants 3 to 5 and 10 to 30 cm, respectively. For Russian-thistle, control decreased from 98 to 78% when evaluated 21 days after treatment following treatments that included 2,4-D choline when applied to plants 3 to 5 and 10 to 30 cm, respectively. For kochia, control decreased from 98 to 84% when evaluated 21 days after treatment following treatments that included 2,4-D choline when applied to plant 3 to 5 and 10 to 30 cm, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmer amaranth control was greatest at the 3 to 5 cm timing.

Taxon
Palmer amaranthe1
Treatment
3 to 5 cm timinge0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest level of weed control for all three weed species was achieved at the 3 to 5 cm timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Russian-thistle control was greatest at the 3 to 5 cm timing.

Taxon
Russian-thistleSalsola traguse1
Treatment
3 to 5 cm timinge0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salsola tragus
Salsola tragus · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest level of weed control for all three weed species was achieved at the 3 to 5 cm timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“Russian-thistle (Salsola tragus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kochia control was greatest at the 3 to 5 cm timing.

Taxon
kochiaBassiae1
Treatment
3 to 5 cm timinge0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bassia
Bassia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest level of weed control for all three weed species was achieved at the 3 to 5 cm timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“kochia (Kochia scoparia L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–271 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed size mattered more for Palmer amaranth control than for kochia control.

Taxon
Palmer amaranthe0
Outcome
weed size was most criticale0
Direction
most criticale0
Comparator
kochiae0

Verbatim

e0

“weed size was most critical for Palmer amaranth and Russian-thistle compared to kochia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1141 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed size mattered more for Russian-thistle control than for kochia control.

Taxon
Russian-thistleSalsola traguse0
Outcome
weed size was most criticale0
Direction
most criticale0
Comparator
kochiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salsola tragus
Salsola tragus · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed size was most critical for Palmer amaranth and Russian-thistle compared to kochia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmer amaranth control with treatments including 2,4-D choline fell from 93 to 74% at 21 days when application size increased from 3 to 5 to 10 to 30 cm.

Taxon
Palmer amaranthe0
Treatment
applications that included 2,4-D cholinee0
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
93 to 74%e0
Qualifier
21 days after treatmente0
Comparator
3 to 5e0

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth control decreased from 93 to 74% when evaluated 21 days after treatment following applications that included 2,4-D choline when applied to plants 3 to 5 and 10 to 30 cm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Russian-thistle control with treatments including 2,4-D choline fell from 98 to 78% at 21 days when application size increased from 3 to 5 to 10 to 30 cm.

Taxon
Russian-thistleSalsola traguse0
Treatment
treatments that included 2,4-D cholinee0
Outcome
Russian-thistle, controle0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
98 to 78%e0
Qualifier
21 days after treatmente0
Comparator
3 to 5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salsola tragus
Salsola tragus · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Russian-thistle, control decreased from 98 to 78% when evaluated 21 days after treatment following treatments that included 2,4-D choline when applied to plants 3 to 5 and 10 to 30 cm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kochia control with treatments including 2,4-D choline fell from 98 to 84% at 21 days when application size increased from 3 to 5 to 10 to 30 cm.

Taxon
kochiaBassiae0
Treatment
treatments that included 2,4-D cholinee0
Outcome
kochia, controle0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
98 to 84%e0
Qualifier
21 days after treatmente0
Comparator
3 to 5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bassia
Bassia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For kochia, control decreased from 98 to 84% when evaluated 21 days after treatment following treatments that included 2,4-D choline when applied to plant 3 to 5 and 10 to 30 cm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1769 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · control · BassiaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.