Paper · 2019 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield and Quality of Basmati Rice Varieties

Uppu Sai Sravan; Shiv Prakash Singh

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A 2-year study conducted to determine the effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and quality of basmati rice varieties in non-traditional area with 54 plots in split plot design. Variety HUBR 10-9 produced 18.8% higher mean grain yield and superior quality parameters than HUBR 2-1. Mean milling, head rice recovery, amylose content and alkali digestion value noted higher with HUBR 10-9 by 4.1%, 4.1%, 8.5% and 15.1% over HUBR 2-1, respectively. Addition of 75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% recommended dose of nitrogen as farmyard manure produced higher mean values by 3.1%, 4.2% and 4.0% for hulling, milling and head rice recovery respectively over 100% recommended dose applied as inorganic sources. Combined use of bio-inoculants (blue green algae plus Azospirillum) exhibited higher values for yield and quality parameters. HUBR 10-9 be grown using 75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% nitrogen as farmyard manure and blue green algae plus Azospirillum for enhancement in yield and quality in non-traditional areas of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Further investigation required under diverse conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety HUBR 10-9 gave 18.8% higher mean grain yield than HUBR 2-1.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
HUBR 10-9e1
Outcome
mean grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
18.8%e1
Comparator
HUBR 2-1e1

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Variety HUBR 10-9 produced 18.8% higher mean grain yield and superior quality parameters than HUBR 2-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety HUBR 10-9 had superior grain quality parameters compared with HUBR 2-1.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
HUBR 10-9e1
Outcome
quality parameterse1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
HUBR 2-1e1

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Variety HUBR 10-9 produced 18.8% higher mean grain yield and superior quality parameters than HUBR 2-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety HUBR 10-9 had 4.1% higher milling than HUBR 2-1.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
HUBR 10-9e2
Outcome
millinge2
Direction
highere2
Value
4.1%e2
Comparator
HUBR 2-1e2

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mean milling, head rice recovery, amylose content and alkali digestion value noted higher with HUBR 10-9 by 4.1%, 4.1%, 8.5% and 15.1% over HUBR 2-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety HUBR 10-9 had 4.1% higher head rice recovery than HUBR 2-1.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
HUBR 10-9e2
Outcome
head rice recoverye2
Direction
highere2
Value
4.1%e2
Comparator
HUBR 2-1e2

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mean milling, head rice recovery, amylose content and alkali digestion value noted higher with HUBR 10-9 by 4.1%, 4.1%, 8.5% and 15.1% over HUBR 2-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety HUBR 10-9 had 8.5% higher amylose content than HUBR 2-1.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
HUBR 10-9e2
Outcome
amylose contente2
Direction
highere2
Value
8.5%e2
Comparator
HUBR 2-1e2

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mean milling, head rice recovery, amylose content and alkali digestion value noted higher with HUBR 10-9 by 4.1%, 4.1%, 8.5% and 15.1% over HUBR 2-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety HUBR 10-9 had 15.1% higher alkali digestion value than HUBR 2-1.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
HUBR 10-9e2
Outcome
alkali digestion valuee2
Direction
highere2
Value
15.1%e2
Comparator
HUBR 2-1e2

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mean milling, head rice recovery, amylose content and alkali digestion value noted higher with HUBR 10-9 by 4.1%, 4.1%, 8.5% and 15.1% over HUBR 2-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining 75% recommended fertilizer dose with 25% nitrogen as farmyard manure gave 3.1% higher hulling than 100% inorganic recommended dose.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% recommended dose of nitrogen as farmyard manuree3
Outcome
hullinge3
Direction
highere3
Value
3.1%e3
Comparator
100% recommended dose applied as inorganic sourcese3

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“Addition of 75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% recommended dose of nitrogen as farmyard manure produced higher mean values by 3.1%, 4.2% and 4.0% for hulling, milling and head rice recovery respectively over 100% recommended dose applied as inorganic sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining 75% recommended fertilizer dose with 25% nitrogen as farmyard manure gave 4.2% higher milling than 100% inorganic recommended dose.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% recommended dose of nitrogen as farmyard manuree3
Outcome
millinge3
Direction
highere3
Value
4.2%e3
Comparator
100% recommended dose applied as inorganic sourcese3

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“Addition of 75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% recommended dose of nitrogen as farmyard manure produced higher mean values by 3.1%, 4.2% and 4.0% for hulling, milling and head rice recovery respectively over 100% recommended dose applied as inorganic sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining 75% recommended fertilizer dose with 25% nitrogen as farmyard manure gave 4.0% higher head rice recovery than 100% inorganic recommended dose.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% recommended dose of nitrogen as farmyard manuree3
Outcome
head rice recoverye3
Direction
highere3
Value
4.0%e3
Comparator
100% recommended dose applied as inorganic sourcese3

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“Addition of 75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% recommended dose of nitrogen as farmyard manure produced higher mean values by 3.1%, 4.2% and 4.0% for hulling, milling and head rice recovery respectively over 100% recommended dose applied as inorganic sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–726 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined use of bio-inoculants (blue green algae plus Azospirillum) gave higher yield and quality parameters.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
Combined use of bio-inoculants (blue green algae plus Azospirillum)e4
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume4symbiont
Second interactor
blue green algaeCyanobacteriotae4symbiont
Outcome
yield and quality parameterse4
Direction
highere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Combined use of bio-inoculants (blue green algae plus Azospirillum) exhibited higher values for yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–852 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Basmati rice HUBR 10-9 should be grown with 75% recommended fertilizer, 25% nitrogen as farmyard manure and bio-inoculants to enhance yield and quality in non-traditional areas of eastern Uttar Pradesh.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
HUBR 10-9e5
Treatment
75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% nitrogen as farmyard manure and blue green algae plus Azospirillume5
Outcome
enhancement in yield and qualitye5
Setting
non-traditional areas of eastern Uttar Pradeshe5

Verbatim

t0

“Basmati Rice Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
e5

“HUBR 10-9 be grown using 75% recommended dose of fertilizers with 25% nitrogen as farmyard manure and blue green algae plus Azospirillum for enhancement in yield and quality in non-traditional areas of eastern Uttar Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1077 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

148 papers: 129 positive, 19 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.