Paper · 2019 · Journal of Central European Agriculture

Changes of species spectrum associated with Fusarium head blight caused by fungicides

Kamil Hudec; Jana Kičinová; Milan Mihók

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a dangerous disease of cereals in case of yield losses and mycotoxin production. The aim of this work was to estimate the influence of used fungicides on species spectrum associated with Fusarium head blight (FHB). The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB. The ears were sprayed with fungicides at beginning of flowering. After development of disease symptoms, fungicide efficacy was estimated, and Fusarium species spectrum were isolated and determined in laboratory. The fungicide efficacy against FHB achieved 60.2 – 88.3 %. The highest effectivity was estimated by using of prothioconazole + tebuconazole and prothioconazole + fluoxastrobin, followed by dimoxystrobin + cyproconazole, metconazole, propiconazole + cyproconazole, and prochloraz + tebuconazole. F. graminearum was the most frequently isolated from the ears, followed by M. nivale, F. avenaceum, F. culmorum, and F. poae. Using of prothioconazole + tebuconazole, metconazole, prothioconazole + fluoxastrobin, and tebuconazole significantly decreased incidence of F. graminearum on infected ears. The incidence of M. nivale on ears was significantly increased by using of all fungicides in comparison with untreated control. The results suggest that the ear spraying by triazole fungicides could enhance the incidence of less susceptible Fusarium species in ears, especially M. nivale. The variability in fungicide efficacy of fungicides against FHB in agricultural praxis colud be affected besides multi-pathogen origin of FHB just by selective effect of fungicides on different Fusarium species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides achieved 60.2 to 88.3% efficacy against FHB in Slovakia.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
fungicidese2
Outcome
fungicide efficacy against FHBe3
Value
60.2 – 88.3 %e3
Setting
Slovakiae1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–323 · show in text ↑
e2

“The ears were sprayed with fungicides at beginning of flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–388 · show in text ↑
e3

“The fungicide efficacy against FHB achieved 60.2 – 88.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prothioconazole + tebuconazole and prothioconazole + fluoxastrobin had the highest effectivity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
prothioconazole + tebuconazole and prothioconazole + fluoxastrobine4
Outcome
effectivitye4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–323 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest effectivity was estimated by using of prothioconazole + tebuconazole and prothioconazole + fluoxastrobin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimoxystrobin + cyproconazole, metconazole and propiconazole + cyproconazole followed in effectivity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
dimoxystrobin + cyproconazole, metconazole, propiconazole + cyproconazolee5
Outcome
effectivitye5
Direction
followed bye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–323 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest effectivity was estimated by using of prothioconazole + tebuconazole and prothioconazole + fluoxastrobin, followed by dimoxystrobin + cyproconazole, metconazole, propiconazole + cyproconazole, and prochloraz + tebuconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prochloraz + tebuconazole followed in effectivity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
prochloraz + tebuconazolee5
Outcome
effectivitye5
Direction
followed bye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–323 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest effectivity was estimated by using of prothioconazole + tebuconazole and prothioconazole + fluoxastrobin, followed by dimoxystrobin + cyproconazole, metconazole, propiconazole + cyproconazole, and prochloraz + tebuconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–830 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. graminearum was the most frequently isolated Fusarium species from wheat ears.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
earse6
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume6pathogen
Outcome
most frequently isolatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–323 · show in text ↑
e6

“F. graminearum was the most frequently isolated from the ears, followed by M. nivale, F. avenaceum, F. culmorum, and F. poae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–956 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. nivale and F. avenaceum followed F. graminearum in isolation frequency from ears.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
earse6
Interactor
M. nivalee6pathogen
Second interactor
F. avenaceumFusarium avenaceume6pathogen
Outcome
isolatede6
Qualifier
F. culmorum, and F. poaee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · Second interactorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–323 · show in text ↑
e6

“F. graminearum was the most frequently isolated from the ears, followed by M. nivale, F. avenaceum, F. culmorum, and F. poae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prothioconazole + tebuconazole, metconazole, prothioconazole + fluoxastrobin and tebuconazole significantly decreased F. graminearum incidence on infected ears.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
infected earse7
Treatment
prothioconazole + tebuconazole, metconazole, prothioconazole + fluoxastrobin, and tebuconazolee7
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume7pathogen
Outcome
incidencee7
Direction
decreasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–323 · show in text ↑
e7

“Using of prothioconazole + tebuconazole, metconazole, prothioconazole + fluoxastrobin, and tebuconazole significantly decreased incidence of F. graminearum on infected ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All fungicides significantly increased M. nivale incidence on ears compared with the untreated control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
earse2
Treatment
all fungicidese2
Interactor
M. nivalee2pathogen
Outcome
incidencee2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–323 · show in text ↑
e2

“The incidence of M. nivale on ears was significantly increased by using of all fungicides in comparison with untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1258 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triazole ear spraying could enhance the incidence of less susceptible Fusarium species in ears.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
ear spraying by triazole fungicidese2
Interactor
Fusarium speciesFusariume2pathogen
Outcome
incidencee2
Direction
enhancee2
Qualifier
less susceptiblee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study was realised in Slovakia on winter wheat by natural infection of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–323 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results suggest that the ear spraying by triazole fungicides could enhance the incidence of less susceptible Fusarium species in ears, especially M. nivale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1419 · show in text ↑

prothioconazole · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tebuconazole · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

metconazole · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.