Abstract
A greenhouse experiment was conducted at Land Resources Research Institute, NARC, Islamabad to examine the impact of humic substances (HSs) coating on potassium fertilizers use efficiency. Tomato variety “Rio Grande” was used. The treatments applied were T1= Control (N, P at 250 and100 mg kg−1 respectively), T2 = N, P + K at 200 mg kg−1 as SOP, T3 = N, P + K at 200 mg kg−1 as NPK blend, T4 = N, P + K at 200 mg kg−1 HSs coated SOP) and T5 = N, P + K at 200 mg kg−1 HSs coated NPK blend. Results indicated a positive impact of sole and HSs coated products on agronomic traits, nutrient concentration, fruit quality traits, flower number, fruit umber, fruit weight, chlorophyll contents, fresh and dry biomass, tissue water contents, diameter and fruit mineral composition. The response of afore said traits to applied treatment varied.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Sole and humic coated fertilizer products improved tomato flower number, fruit number and fruit weight, with variable response among traits.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- sole and HSs coated productse0
- Outcome
- flower number, fruit umber, fruit weighte0
- Direction
- positive impacte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results indicated a positive impact of sole and HSs coated products on agronomic traits, nutrient concentration, fruit quality traits, flower number, fruit umber, fruit weight, chlorophyll contents, fresh and dry biomass, tissue water contents, diameter and fruit mineral composition. The response of afore said traits to applied treatment varied”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole and humic coated fertilizer products improved nutrient concentration, chlorophyll contents and tissue water contents, with variable responses.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- sole and HSs coated productse0
- Outcome
- nutrient concentration, fruit quality traitse0
- Direction
- positive impacte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results indicated a positive impact of sole and HSs coated products on agronomic traits, nutrient concentration, fruit quality traits, flower number, fruit umber, fruit weight, chlorophyll contents, fresh and dry biomass, tissue water contents, diameter and fruit mineral composition. The response of afore said traits to applied treatment varied”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole and humic coated fertilizer products had a positive impact on fresh and dry biomass and diameter.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- sole and HSs coated productse0
- Outcome
- fresh and dry biomasse0
- Direction
- positive impacte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results indicated a positive impact of sole and HSs coated products on agronomic traits, nutrient concentration, fruit quality traits, flower number, fruit umber, fruit weight, chlorophyll contents, fresh and dry biomass, tissue water contents, diameter and fruit mineral composition”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole and humic coated fertilizer products had a positive impact on fruit mineral composition.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- sole and HSs coated productse0
- Outcome
- fruit mineral compositione0
- Direction
- positive impacte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results indicated a positive impact of sole and HSs coated products on agronomic traits, nutrient concentration, fruit quality traits, flower number, fruit umber, fruit weight, chlorophyll contents, fresh and dry biomass, tissue water contents, diameter and fruit mineral composition”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
other · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →other · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →other · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
126 papers more in this group
See all 130 papers →other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
171 papers more in this group
See all 175 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.