Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of weed control on weed competition, soil microbial activity and rice productivity in conservation agriculture-based direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system

Jitesh Kumar Baghel; T. K. Das; D.S. Rana; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during 2012–13 and 2013–14 at New Delhi, to evaluate the effects of weedcontrol options on weed interference, microbial activity and direct-seeded rice (DSR) productivity in a conservation agriculture (CA)-based rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori et Paol) cropping system. The CA practices such as brown manuring, mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] residue (MR) and rice-residue (RR) retention, zero tillage (ZT) significantly influenced weed density, microbial activity and crop yield. Grassy weeds were more dominant among the weeds. The DSR practices encountered more weed infestations than transplanted rice (TPR). The sequential applications of pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg/ha as pre-emergence, and bispyribac-Na @ 25 g/ha at 25 days after sowing/transplanting (DAS/DAT) as post-emergence resulted in better control of weeds and higher weed-control efficiency (WCE), but this combination plus 1 hand-weeding (HW) at 45 DAS was the best weed-control option in DSR. Higher WCE of 50% and 52% obtained from this treatment respectively, in 2012 and 2013. These herbicides applications slightly reduced microbial activity at 40 DAS. Soil microbial activity positively responded to CA practices. Soil-dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) were significantly higher in DSR than TPR. The rice yields were comparable between the TPR-ZTW and DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + wheat residue (WR) systems, but higher than in other CA-based DSR-wheat systems. Treatment DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + WR provided higher grain yield 4.41 t/ha and 4.53 t/ha in 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown manuring and residue retention and zero tillage significantly influenced weed density, microbial activity and crop yield.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
brown manuring, mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] residue (MR) and rice-residue (RR) retention, zero tillage (ZT)e0
Outcome
weed density, microbial activity and crop yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CA practices such as brown manuring, mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] residue (MR) and rice-residue (RR) retention, zero tillage (ZT) significantly influenced weed density, microbial activity and crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grassy weeds were dominant among weeds in the rice system.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Interactor
Grassy weedse0weed
Outcome
Grassy weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grassy weeds were more dominant among the weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct-seeded rice had more weed infestation than transplanted rice.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
DSR practicese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed infestationse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
transplanted rice (TPR)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DSR practices encountered more weed infestations than transplanted rice (TPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pendimethalin and bispyribac-Na improved weed control.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg/ha as pre-emergence, and bispyribac-Na @ 25 g/ha at 25 days after sowing/transplanting (DAS/DAT) as post-emergencee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed-control efficiency (WCE)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sequential applications of pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg/ha as pre-emergence, and bispyribac-Na @ 25 g/ha at 25 days after sowing/transplanting (DAS/DAT) as post-emergence resulted in better control of weeds and higher weed-control efficiency (WCE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding hand weeding to the herbicide sequence gave the best direct-seeded rice weed control, with 50% and 52% efficiency in 2012 and 2013.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
this combination plus 1 hand-weeding (HW) at 45 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
WCEe0
Direction
Highere0
Value
50% and 52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this combination plus 1 hand-weeding (HW) at 45 DAS was the best weed-control option in DSR. Higher WCE of 50% and 52% obtained from this treatment respectively, in 2012 and 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide applications slightly reduced soil microbial activity at 40 days after sowing.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
herbicides applicationse0
Outcome
microbial activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
40 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These herbicides applications slightly reduced microbial activity at 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial activity responded positively to conservation agriculture practices.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
CA practicese0
Outcome
Soil microbial activitye0
Direction
positively respondede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil microbial activity positively responded to CA practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil dehydrogenase activity and microbial biomass carbon were significantly higher under direct-seeded than transplanted rice.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
DSRe0
Outcome
Soil-dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
TPRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil-dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) were significantly higher in DSR than TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yields were comparable between TPR-ZTW and DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + WR and exceeded other systems.

Treatment
DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + wheat residue (WR)e0
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
higher than in other CA-based DSR-wheat systemse0
Comparator
TPR-ZTWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice yields were comparable between the TPR-ZTW and DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + wheat residue (WR) systems, but higher than in other CA-based DSR-wheat systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1530 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + WR yielded 4.41 t/ha in 2012.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + WRe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.41 t/hae0
Qualifier
2012e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + WR provided higher grain yield 4.41 t/ha and 4.53 t/ha in 2012 and 2013, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1651 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + WR yielded 4.53 t/ha in 2013.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + WRe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.53 t/hae0
Qualifier
2013e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment DSR + MR-ZTW + RR-SMB + WR provided higher grain yield 4.41 t/ha and 4.53 t/ha in 2012 and 2013, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1651 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–157 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 110 positive, 14 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 125 positive, 3 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

herbicide · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

tillage · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

transplanting · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 129 positive, 17 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

transplanting · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.