Paper · 2019 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Control of multiple-resistant waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer] with preemergence and postemergence herbicides in corn in Ontario

Lauren Benoit; Nader Soltani; David C. Hooker; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Waterhemp is a competitive, summer annual, broadleaf weed that poses a considerable threat to Ontario grain farmers. Populations with multiple resistance to Group 2 (ALS-inhibitors), Group 5 (photosystem II inhibitors), and Group 9 (EPSPS inhibitors) herbicides have been confirmed in Ontario. If left uncontrolled, waterhemp competition can result in corn yield losses of up to 74%. The objective of this research was to evaluate preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) herbicides for control of multiple-herbicide resistant (MR) waterhemp. Two field studies at two locations (Cottam and Walpole Island) were conducted in 2016 and 2017. Fifteen PRE and 12 POST herbicides were evaluated for waterhemp control, density, and aboveground biomass and corn yield. At 8 wk after application (WAA), S-metolachlor/mesotrione/atrazine (1393/139/524 g a.i. ha −1 ) and S-metolachlor/mesotrione/bicyclopyrone/atrazine (1259/140/35/588 g a.i. ha −1 ) applied PRE were the most efficacious, controlling MR waterhemp 87% and 91%, respectively. At 8 WAA, the most efficacious POST herbicides were mesotrione + atrazine and dicamba/atrazine, controlling MR waterhemp 92% and 87%, respectively. Reduced waterhemp interference with the PRE herbicides evaluated resulted in corn yield that was similar to the weed-free control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor/mesotrione/atrazine applied preemergence was among the most efficacious treatments, controlling multiple-resistant waterhemp 87% at 8 weeks after application.

Treatment
S-metolachlor/mesotrione/atrazinee1
Interactor
waterhempe2weed
Outcome
controlling MR waterhempe2
Direction
most efficaciouse2
Value
87%e2
Setting
Ontariot0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicides in corn in Ontario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“S-metolachlor/mesotrione/atrazine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–830 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied PRE were the most efficacious, controlling MR waterhemp 87% and 91%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor/mesotrione/bicyclopyrone/atrazine applied preemergence was among the most efficacious treatments, controlling multiple-resistant waterhemp 91% at 8 weeks after application.

Treatment
S-metolachlor/mesotrione/bicyclopyrone/atrazinee3
Interactor
waterhempe2weed
Outcome
controlling MR waterhempe2
Direction
most efficaciouse2
Value
91%e2
Setting
Ontariot0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicides in corn in Ontario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–144 · show in text ↑
e3

“S-metolachlor/mesotrione/bicyclopyrone/atrazine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–911 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied PRE were the most efficacious, controlling MR waterhemp 87% and 91%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione + atrazine applied postemergence was among the most efficacious treatments, controlling multiple-resistant waterhemp 92% at 8 weeks after application.

Treatment
mesotrione + atrazinee4
Interactor
waterhempe4weed
Outcome
controlling MR waterhempe4
Direction
most efficaciouse4
Value
92%e4
Setting
Ontariot0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicides in corn in Ontario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–144 · show in text ↑
e4

“the most efficacious POST herbicides were mesotrione + atrazine and dicamba/atrazine, controlling MR waterhemp 92% and 87%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba/atrazine applied postemergence was among the most efficacious treatments, controlling multiple-resistant waterhemp 87% at 8 weeks after application.

Treatment
dicamba/atrazinee4
Interactor
waterhempe4weed
Outcome
controlling MR waterhempe4
Direction
most efficaciouse4
Value
87%e4
Setting
Ontariot0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicides in corn in Ontario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–144 · show in text ↑
e4

“the most efficacious POST herbicides were mesotrione + atrazine and dicamba/atrazine, controlling MR waterhemp 92% and 87%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence herbicides that reduced waterhemp interference gave corn yield similar to the weed-free control.

Treatment
PRE herbicidese5
Interactor
waterhempe5weed
Outcome
corn yielde5
Direction
similare5
Comparator
weed-free controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicides in corn in Ontario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–144 · show in text ↑
e5

“Reduced waterhemp interference with the PRE herbicides evaluated resulted in corn yield that was similar to the weed-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1312 · show in text ↑

mesotrione · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

atrazine · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

dicamba · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.