Paper · 2018 · The Agriculturists

Efficacy of Trichoderma against Colletotrichum capsici Causing Fruit Rot Due to Anthracnose of Chili (Capsicum annum L.)

MA Rahman; TH Ansari; MF Alam; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Five Trichoderma species/strains, Trichoderma virens IMI-392430, T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431, T. harzianum IMI-392432, T. harzianum IMI-392433 and T. harzianum IMI-392434 were tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli. Effect of Trichoderma species in suppressing anthracnose and fruit rot as well as the growth and yield of chilli were evaluated. Seven treatments consisting of five Trichoderma strains, one Colletotrichum capsici and control were used as seed treatments. Chilli seeds were treated with spore suspension or secondary metabolites of each Trichoderma species/strain and C. capsici separately. Mixture of suspension of each Trichoderma species/strain with C. capsici was also used as spore suspension or secondary metabolites. Percent fruit infection in the control treatment was found almost similar to the treatment that contained T. viridae and T. pseudokoningii spore suspension or secondary metabolites. T. harzianum strains alone suppressed fruit infection (%) significantly. Further all the Trichoderma species/strains reduced the fruit infection (%) than the diseased control even when seeds were treated with Trichoderma separately mixing with C. capsici. Spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 was found much more effective against C. capsici which suppressed 95.8% and 79.6 % fruit infection respectively under natural (without C. capsici) and high inoculum pressure of C. capsici. All the tested Trichoderma species/strains showed higher plant growth and increased fruit yield irrespective of rest of the treatments. It was found that Trichoderma strains control chilli fruit rot significantly but high inoculum pressure of C. capsici reduced fruit yield drastically. Among the treatments, spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 increased the fruit yield 83.6% and 76.5% per plant compared to spore suspension of C. capsici and control treatments, respectively. These results implied that T. harzianum IMI-392433 can effectively control fruit rot of chili caused by C. capsici through host resistance and antifungal metabolite activity. The fruit yield was increased due to the influence of T. harzianum IMI-392433 on vigorous physiological growth of plants as well as efficacy against the disease. The Agriculturists 2018; 16(2) 75-87

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit infection in the control treatment was almost similar to that with T. viridae and T. pseudokoningii spore suspension or secondary metabolites in chilli.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
fruite1
Treatment
T. viridae and T. pseudokoningii spore suspension or secondary metabolitese1
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt0pathogen
Second interactor
T. viridaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Percent fruit infectione1
Direction
almost similare1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e1

“Percent fruit infection in the control treatment was found almost similar to the treatment that contained T. viridae and T. pseudokoningii spore suspension or secondary metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of Trichoderma against Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum strains alone significantly suppressed fruit infection in chilli.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
fruite2
Treatment
T. harzianum strains alonee2
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianum strainsTrichoderma harzianume2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit infection (%)e2
Direction
suppressede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e2

“T. harzianum strains alone suppressed fruit infection (%) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of Trichoderma against Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All Trichoderma species/strains reduced fruit infection relative to the diseased control in chilli, even when seeds were treated with Trichoderma mixed with C. capsici.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
fruite3
Treatment
Trichoderma species/strainse3
Interactor
C. capsiciColletotrichum truncatume3pathogen
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit infection (%)e3
Direction
reducede3
Comparator
diseased controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e3

“Further all the Trichoderma species/strains reduced the fruit infection (%) than the diseased control even when seeds were treated with Trichoderma separately mixing with C. capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 suppressed fruit infection by 95.8% under natural conditions without C. capsici.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
fruite5
Treatment
Spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433e4
Interactor
C. capsiciColletotrichum truncatume4pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianum IMI-392433Trichoderma harzianume4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit infectione5
Direction
suppressede5
Value
95.8%e5
Setting
natural (without C. capsici)e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 was found much more effective against C. capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1282 · show in text ↑
e5

“suppressed 95.8% and 79.6 % fruit infection respectively under natural (without C. capsici) and high inoculum pressure of C. capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 suppressed fruit infection by 79.6 % under high inoculum pressure of C. capsici.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
fruite5
Treatment
Spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433e4
Interactor
C. capsiciColletotrichum truncatume4pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianum IMI-392433Trichoderma harzianume4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit infectione5
Direction
suppressede5
Value
79.6 %e5
Setting
high inoculum pressure of C. capsicie5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 was found much more effective against C. capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1282 · show in text ↑
e5

“suppressed 95.8% and 79.6 % fruit infection respectively under natural (without C. capsici) and high inoculum pressure of C. capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 increased chilli fruit yield by 83.6% per plant compared with spore suspension of C. capsici.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
fruite6
Treatment
spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433e6
Interactor
C. capsiciColletotrichum truncatume6pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianum IMI-392433Trichoderma harzianume6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Value
83.6%e6
Qualifier
per plante6
Comparator
spore suspension of C. capsicie6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e6

“spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 increased the fruit yield 83.6% and 76.5% per plant compared to spore suspension of C. capsici and control treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 increased chilli fruit yield by 76.5% per plant compared with control treatments.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
fruite6
Treatment
spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433e6
Interactor
C. capsiciColletotrichum truncatume6pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianum IMI-392433Trichoderma harzianume6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Value
76.5%e6
Qualifier
per plante6
Comparator
control treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e6

“spore suspension of T. harzianum IMI-392433 increased the fruit yield 83.6% and 76.5% per plant compared to spore suspension of C. capsici and control treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested Trichoderma species/strains increased chilli plant growth relative to the rest of the treatments.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Trichoderma species/strainse7
Outcome
plant growthe7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse7

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e7

“All the tested Trichoderma species/strains showed higher plant growth and increased fruit yield irrespective of rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested Trichoderma species/strains increased chilli fruit yield relative to the rest of the treatments.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
fruite7
Treatment
Trichoderma species/strainse7
Outcome
fruit yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse7

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e7

“All the tested Trichoderma species/strains showed higher plant growth and increased fruit yield irrespective of rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma strains significantly controlled chilli fruit rot.

Taxon
chillie7
Treatment
Trichoderma strainse7
Outcome
fruit rote7
Direction
decreaseinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e7

“It was found that Trichoderma strains control chilli fruit rot significantly but high inoculum pressure of C. capsici reduced fruit yield drastically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High inoculum pressure of C. capsici drastically reduced chilli fruit yield.

Taxon
chillie7
Treatment
high inoculum pressure of C. capsicie7
Interactor
C. capsiciColletotrichum truncatume7pathogen
Outcome
fruit yielde7
Direction
reducede7
Qualifier
drasticallye7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e7

“It was found that Trichoderma strains control chilli fruit rot significantly but high inoculum pressure of C. capsici reduced fruit yield drastically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1708 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors interpret that T. harzianum IMI-392433 controls chilli fruit rot caused by C. capsici through host resistance and antifungal metabolite activity.

Taxon
chilie1
Treatment
T. harzianum IMI-392433e1
Interactor
C. capsiciColletotrichum truncatume1pathogen
Outcome
fruit rote1
Qualifier
through host resistance and antifungal metabolite activitye1

Verbatim

e1

“T. harzianum IMI-392433 can effectively control fruit rot of chili caused by C. capsici through host resistance and antifungal metabolite activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–2082 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors interpret that the fruit yield increase from T. harzianum IMI-392433 results from vigorous physiological growth of plants and efficacy against the disease.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
T. harzianum IMI-392433e1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Qualifier
vigorous physiological growth of plants as well as efficacy against the diseasee1

Verbatim

e0

“tested against anthracnose and fruit rot of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–227 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fruit yield was increased due to the influence of T. harzianum IMI-392433 on vigorous physiological growth of plants as well as efficacy against the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2084–2244 · show in text ↑

metabolite · Colletotrichum truncatum · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma pseudokoningii · Colletotrichum truncatum · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma · Colletotrichum truncatum · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Trichoderma · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Trichoderma · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Trichoderma · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Colletotrichum truncatum · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.