Paper · 2019 · Foods

Effects of Light-Emitting Diodes on the Accumulation of Glucosinolates and Phenolic Compounds in Sprouting Canola (Brassica napus L.)

Chang Ha Park; Nam Su Kim; Jong Seok Park; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
69
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, we investigated optimal light conditions for enhancement of the growth and accumulation of glucosinolates and phenolics in the sprouts of canola (Brassica napus L.). We found that the shoot lengths and fresh weights of red light-irradiated sprouts were higher than those of sprouts exposed to white, blue, and blue + red light, whereas root length was not notably different among red, blue, white, and blue + red light treatments. The accumulations of total glucosinolates in plants irradiated with white, blue, and red lights were not significantly different (19.32 ± 0.13, 20.69 ± 0.05, and 20.65 ± 1.70 mg/g dry weight (wt.), respectively). However, sprouts exposed to blue + red light contained the lowest levels of total glucosinolates (17.08 ± 0.28 mg/g dry wt.). The accumulation of total phenolic compounds was the highest in plants irradiated with blue light (3.81 ± 0.08 mg/g dry wt.), 1.33 times higher than the lowest level in plants irradiated with red light (2.87 ± 0.05 mg/g dry wt.). These results demonstrate that red light-emitting diode (LED) light is suitable for sprout growth and that blue LED light is effective in increasing the accumulation of glucosinolates and phenolics in B. napus sprouts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light produced greater shoot length and fresh weight than white, blue, or combined blue and red light.

Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
shoot lengths and fresh weightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
white, blue, and blue + red lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shoot lengths and fresh weights of red light-irradiated sprouts were higher than those of sprouts exposed to white, blue, and blue + red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 107–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length was not notably different among the four light treatments.

Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
not notably differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length was not notably different among red, blue, white, and blue + red light treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–444 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 107–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total glucosinolates did not significantly differ under white, blue, and red lights.

Outcome
accumulations of total glucosinolatese0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The accumulations of total glucosinolates in plants irradiated with white, blue, and red lights were not significantly different (19.32 ± 0.13, 20.69 ± 0.05, and 20.65 ± 1.70 mg/g dry weight (wt.), respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 107–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined blue and red light produced the lowest total glucosinolate level, 17.08 ± 0.28 mg/g dry weight.

Outcome
levels of total glucosinolatese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
17.08 ± 0.28 mg/g dry wt.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sprouts exposed to blue + red light contained the lowest levels of total glucosinolates (17.08 ± 0.28 mg/g dry wt.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 107–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light gave the highest total phenolic compound accumulation, 3.81 ± 0.08 mg/g dry weight.

Outcome
accumulation of total phenolic compoundse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.81 ± 0.08 mg/g dry wt.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The accumulation of total phenolic compounds was the highest in plants irradiated with blue light (3.81 ± 0.08 mg/g dry wt.), 1.33 times higher than the lowest level in plants irradiated with red light (2.87 ± 0.05 mg/g dry wt.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 107–133 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.