Paper · 2019 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Molecular and Biological Characterization of Ralstonia Phage RsoM1USA, a New Species of P2virus, Isolated in the United States

Hardian Susilo Addy; Abdelmonim Ali Ahmad; Qi Huang

1
claims
1
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The first Ralstonia-infecting bacteriophage from soil of the USA, designated RsoM1USA, was isolated from a tomato field in Florida. Electron Microscopy revealed that phage RsoM1USA is member of the genus P2virus in the family Myoviridae with an icosahedral head of about 66 nm in diameter, a contractile tail of about 152 nm in length, and a long “neck”. Phage RsoM1USA has a relatively wide host range infecting 13 of the 30 tested R. solanacearum species complex strains collected worldwide in each of the three Ralstonia species: R. solanacearum, R. pseudosolanacearum and R. syzygii. The phage completed its infection cycle 180 minutes post infection with a burst size of about 56 particles per cell. Phage RsoM1USA has a genome of 39,309 nucleotides containing 58 open reading frames (ORFs) and is closely related to Ralstonia phage RSA1, the type phage of the species Ralstonia virus RSA1. The genomic organization of phage RsoM1USA is also similar to that of phage RSA1, but their integrases share no sequence homology. In addition, we determined that the integration of phage RsoM1USA into its susceptible R. solanacearum strain K60 is mediated by the 3’ 45-base portion of the threonine tRNA (TGT), not arginine tRNA (CCG) as reported for phage RSA1, confirming that the two phages use different mechanism for integration. Our proteomic analysis of the purified virions supported the annotation of the main structural proteins. Infection of a susceptible R. solanacearum strain RUN302 by phage RsoM1USA resulted in significantly reduced growth of the infected bacterium in vitro, but not virulence in tomato plants, as compared to its uninfected RUN302 strain. Due to its differences from phage RSA1, phage RsoM1USA should be considered the type phage of a new species with a proposed species name of Ralstonia virus RsoM1USA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phage infection did not alter Ralstonia virulence in tomato plants relative to uninfected bacteria.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
Infection of a susceptible R. solanacearum strain RUN302 by phage RsoM1USAe0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
virulence in tomato plantse0
Comparator
uninfected RUN302 straine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infection of a susceptible R. solanacearum strain RUN302 by phage RsoM1USA resulted in significantly reduced growth of the infected bacterium in vitro, but not virulence in tomato plants, as compared to its uninfected RUN302 strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1668 · show in text ↑

Ralstonia solanacearum · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

infection · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 29 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.