Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Management of Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV) Disease in Chilli through Biotic Defense Inducers

V.V. Kavyashri; N. Nagaraju

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Different biotic defense inducers such as, red seaweed extract (Kappaphycus alvarezii), plant extracts (Mirabilis jalapa L. and Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd.), biocontrol agents (Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescens) and other defense inducing biomolecules viz., synthetic nucleoside, chitosan and virex-H were tested for their efficacy on Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection in Chilli var. Pusa Jwala during Kharif2016-17and Kharif 2017-18under field conditions. Results showed that a significantly less PDI (35.29 %) and AUDPC (1238.33) was observed in plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%) with enhanced plant height (49.19 cm), number of branches (19.52 no.), number of fruits per plant (187.87 no.), individual fruit weight (2.44 g), fresh fruit yield (483.56 g.plant-1), fresh weight (4.59 t.ha-1), dry weight (1.38 t.ha-1). Significant differences among the treatments by reducing the CMV disease with increased growth and yield was observed and is found superior over the untreated control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated chilli had PDI of 35.29%, significantly lower than untreated control.

Taxon
Chillie1
Material
Pusa Jwalae1
Treatment
Chitosan (0.1%)e0
Interactor
Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)cucumber mosaic cucumoviruse1pathogen
Outcome
PDIe0
Direction
lesse0
Value
35.29 %e0
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

cucumber mosaic cucumovirus
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · InteractorDieterO · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly less PDI (35.29 %) and AUDPC (1238.33) was observed in plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–608 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection in Chilli var. Pusa Jwala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated chilli had AUDPC of 1238.33, significantly lower than untreated control.

Taxon
Chillie1
Material
Pusa Jwalae1
Treatment
Chitosan (0.1%)e0
Interactor
Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)cucumber mosaic cucumoviruse1pathogen
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
lesse0
Value
1238.33e0
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

cucumber mosaic cucumovirus
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · InteractorDieterO · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly less PDI (35.29 %) and AUDPC (1238.33) was observed in plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–608 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection in Chilli var. Pusa Jwala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated chilli had enhanced plant height of 49.19 cm.

Taxon
Chillie1
Material
Pusa Jwalae1
Treatment
Chitosan (0.1%)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
49.19 cme0
Comparator
untreated controle2

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%) with enhanced plant height (49.19 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chilli var. Pusa Jwala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated chilli had 19.52 branches.

Taxon
Chillie1
Material
Pusa Jwalae1
Treatment
Chitosan (0.1%)e0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
19.52 no.e0
Comparator
untreated controle2

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%) with enhanced plant height (49.19 cm), number of branches (19.52 no.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–678 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chilli var. Pusa Jwala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated chilli had 187.87 fruits per plant.

Taxon
Chillie1
Material
Pusa Jwalae1
Treatment
Chitosan (0.1%)e0
Outcome
number of fruits per plante0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
187.87 no.e0
Comparator
untreated controle2

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%) with enhanced plant height (49.19 cm), number of branches (19.52 no.), number of fruits per plant (187.87 no.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–719 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chilli var. Pusa Jwala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated chilli had individual fruit weight of 2.44 g.

Taxon
Chillie1
Material
Pusa Jwalae1
Treatment
Chitosan (0.1%)e0
Outcome
individual fruit weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
2.44 ge0
Comparator
untreated controle2

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%) with enhanced plant height (49.19 cm), number of branches (19.52 no.), number of fruits per plant (187.87 no.), individual fruit weight (2.44 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–753 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chilli var. Pusa Jwala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated chilli had fresh fruit yield of 483.56 g.plant-1.

Taxon
Chillie1
Material
Pusa Jwalae1
Treatment
Chitosan (0.1%)e0
Outcome
fresh fruit yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
483.56 g.plant-1e0
Comparator
untreated controle2

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%) with enhanced plant height (49.19 cm), number of branches (19.52 no.), number of fruits per plant (187.87 no.), individual fruit weight (2.44 g), fresh fruit yield (483.56 g.plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chilli var. Pusa Jwala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated chilli had fresh weight of 4.59 t.ha-1.

Taxon
Chillie1
Material
Pusa Jwalae1
Treatment
Chitosan (0.1%)e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
4.59 t.ha-1e0
Comparator
untreated controle2

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%) with enhanced plant height (49.19 cm), number of branches (19.52 no.), number of fruits per plant (187.87 no.), individual fruit weight (2.44 g), fresh fruit yield (483.56 g.plant-1), fresh weight (4.59 t.ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chilli var. Pusa Jwala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated chilli had dry weight of 1.38 t.ha-1.

Taxon
Chillie1
Material
Pusa Jwalae1
Treatment
Chitosan (0.1%)e0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
1.38 t.ha-1e0
Comparator
untreated controle2

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with Chitosan (0.1%) with enhanced plant height (49.19 cm), number of branches (19.52 no.), number of fruits per plant (187.87 no.), individual fruit weight (2.44 g), fresh fruit yield (483.56 g.plant-1), fresh weight (4.59 t.ha-1), dry weight (1.38 t.ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chilli var. Pusa Jwala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1013 · show in text ↑

chitosan · cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

chitosan · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.