Paper · 2019 · Toxins

Occurrence and Ear Damage of Helicoverpa zea on Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis Maize in the Field in Texas, U.S. and Its Susceptibility to Vip3A Protein

Fei Yang; José C. Santiago González; Jayme Williams; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
102
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), is a major pest of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) maize and cotton in the U.S. Reduced efficacy of Bt plants expressing Cry1 and Cry2 against H. zea has been reported in some areas of the U.S. In this study, we evaluated the occurrence and ear damage of H. zea on transgenic Bt maize expressing Cry proteins or a combination of Vip3A and Cry proteins in the field in Texas in 2018. We found that the occurrence of H. zea larvae and the viable kernel damage area on the ear were not different between non-Bt maize and Bt maize expressing Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 and Cry1Ab+Cry1F proteins. A total of 67.5% of the pyramided Bt maize expressing Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A was damaged by 2nd–4th instar larvae of H. zea. Diet bioassays showed that the resistance ratio against Vip3Aa51 for H. zea obtained from Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A maize was 20.4 compared to a field population collected from Cry1F+Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 maize. Leaf tissue bioassays showed that 7-day survivorship on WideStrike3 (Cry1F+Cry1Ac+Vip3A) cotton leaves was significantly higher for the H. zea population collected from Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A maize than for a Bt-susceptible laboratory population. The results generated from this study suggest that H. zea has evolved practical resistance to Cry1 and Cry2 proteins. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure the sustainable use of the Vip3A technology in Bt maize and cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Helicoverpa zea larval occurrence and viable kernel damage area on the ear did not differ between non-Bt maize and Bt maize expressing Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 and Cry1Ab+Cry1F proteins.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
eare0
Treatment
Bt maize expressing Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 and Cry1Ab+Cry1F proteinse0
Interactor
H. zeaHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
occurrence of H. zea larvae and the viable kernel damage areae0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
non-Bt maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the occurrence of H. zea larvae and the viable kernel damage area on the ear were not different between non-Bt maize and Bt maize expressing Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 and Cry1Ab+Cry1F proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–621 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A total of 67.5% of the pyramided Bt maize expressing Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A was damaged by H. zea larvae.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3Ae1
Interactor
H. zeaHelicoverpa zeae1pest
Outcome
damagede1
Value
67.5%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A total of 67.5% of the pyramided Bt maize expressing Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A was damaged by 2nd–4th instar larvae of H. zea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–742 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. zea resistance ratio against Vip3Aa51 was 20.4 for the population from Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A maize, compared with a field population from Cry1F+Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Interactor
H. zeaHelicoverpa zeae2pest
Gene
Vip3Aa51e2
Outcome
resistance ratio against Vip3Aa51e2
Value
20.4e2
Comparator
a field population collected from Cry1F+Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 maizee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Diet bioassays showed that the resistance ratio against Vip3Aa51 for H. zea obtained from Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A maize was 20.4 compared to a field population collected from Cry1F+Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–943 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 7-day survivorship of H. zea on WideStrike3 cotton leaves was significantly higher for the population from Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A maize than for a Bt-susceptible laboratory population.

Material
H. zea population collected from Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A maizee3
Treatment
WideStrike3 (Cry1F+Cry1Ac+Vip3A) cotton leavese3
Interactor
H. zeaHelicoverpa zeae3pest
Outcome
7-day survivorshipe3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
a Bt-susceptible laboratory populatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“7-day survivorship on WideStrike3 (Cry1F+Cry1Ac+Vip3A) cotton leaves was significantly higher for the H. zea population collected from Cry1Ab+Cry1F+Vip3A maize than for a Bt-susceptible laboratory population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. zea has evolved practical resistance to Cry1 and Cry2 proteins in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
H. zeaHelicoverpa zeae4pest
Gene
Cry1 and Cry2 proteinse4
Outcome
practical resistancee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The results generated from this study suggest that H. zea has evolved practical resistance to Cry1 and Cry2 proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1304 · show in text ↑
e0

“the occurrence of H. zea larvae and the viable kernel damage area on the ear were not different between non-Bt maize and Bt maize expressing Cry1A.105+Cry2Ab2 and Cry1Ab+Cry1F proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–621 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ensuring the sustainable use of the Vip3A technology in maize is crucial.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse5
Gene
Vip3Ae5
Outcome
sustainable use of the Vip3A technologye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“it is crucial to ensure the sustainable use of the Vip3A technology in Bt maize and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1407 · show in text ↑

transgenic · Helicoverpa zea · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.