Paper · 2014 · PLoS ONE

A Challenge for the Seed Mixture Refuge Strategy in Bt Maize: Impact of Cross-Pollination on an Ear-Feeding Pest, Corn Earworm

Fei Yang; David L. Kerns; Graham P. Head; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
84
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To counter the threat of insect resistance, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) maize growers in the U.S. are required to plant structured non-Bt maize refuges. Concerns with refuge compliance led to the introduction of seed mixtures, also called RIB (refuge-in-the-bag), as an alternative approach for implementing refuge for Bt maize products in the U.S. Maize Belt. A major concern in RIB is cross-pollination of maize hybrids that can cause Bt proteins to be present in refuge maize kernels and negatively affect refuge insects. Here we show that a mixed planting of 5% nonBt and 95% Bt maize containing the SmartStax traits expressing Cry1A.105, Cry2Ab2 and Cry1F did not provide an effective refuge for an important above-ground ear-feeding pest, the corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie). Cross-pollination in RIB caused a majority (>90%) of refuge kernels to express ≥ one Bt protein. The contamination of Bt proteins in the refuge ears reduced neonate-to-adult survivorship of H. zea to only 4.6%, a reduction of 88.1% relative to larvae feeding on ears of pure non-Bt maize plantings. In addition, the limited survivors on refuge ears had lower pupal mass and took longer to develop to adults.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5% nonBt and 95% Bt maize mixture failed to provide an effective corn earworm refuge.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
mixed planting of 5% nonBt and 95% Bt maizee0
Interactor
Helicoverpa zeaHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
did not provide an effective refugee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a mixed planting of 5% nonBt and 95% Bt maize containing the SmartStax traits expressing Cry1A.105, Cry2Ab2 and Cry1F did not provide an effective refuge for an important above-ground ear-feeding pest, the corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–787 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross-pollination caused over 90% of refuge kernels to express at least one Bt protein.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
refuge kernels to express ≥ one Bt proteine0
Value
>90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cross-pollination in RIB caused a majority (>90%) of refuge kernels to express ≥ one Bt protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt protein contamination reduced H. zea survival to 4.6%, an 88.1% reduction versus pure non-Bt maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
contamination of Bt proteinse0
Interactor
H. zeaHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
neonate-to-adult survivorship of H. zeae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.6%e0
Qualifier
a reduction of 88.1%e0
Comparator
pure non-Bt maize plantingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contamination of Bt proteins in the refuge ears reduced neonate-to-adult survivorship of H. zea to only 4.6%, a reduction of 88.1% relative to larvae feeding on ears of pure non-Bt maize plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surviving H. zea on refuge ears had lower pupal mass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Corn EarwormHelicoverpa zeat0pest
Outcome
pupal masse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the limited survivors on refuge ears had lower pupal mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize: Impact of Cross-Pollination on an Ear-Feeding Pest, Corn Earworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surviving H. zea on refuge ears took longer to develop to adults.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Corn EarwormHelicoverpa zeat0pest
Outcome
develop to adultse0
Direction
longere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the limited survivors on refuge ears had lower pupal mass and took longer to develop to adults”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize: Impact of Cross-Pollination on an Ear-Feeding Pest, Corn Earworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–126 · show in text ↑

transgenic · Helicoverpa zea · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.