Paper · 1997

Split nitrogen applications for management of yield and protein of wheat grown in dryland

F. Selles; R. P. Zentner; C. A. Campbell; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The feasibility of using split-N applications for managing yield and protein of wheat grown on dryland was studied in a field experiment initiated on a sandy loam and silt loam near Swift Current. Spring wheat was grown on wheat stubble and was fertilized at seeding with 0,20,40, 60, and 80 kg N/ha. In addition, five N topdressing treatments were applied at the five-leaf, flagleaf, and anthesis to the plots receiving 0 and 80 kg N/ha at time of seeding. Topdressing treatments were 5 kg N/ha as urea-ammonium nitrate solution (UAN) foliar applied; 10 kg N as urea broadcast or UAN dribble banded onto the soil surface; 20 kg N/ha as urea broadcast; and 20 kg N/ha as UAN dribble banded. One set of plots received no topdressing treatment (Check). In general, because of the low soil NOJ-N and high soil moisture in the spring, and adequate rains during the growing season, grain yields had large responses to N applied at seeding. Grain protein decreased with the first 20 to 40 kg N/ha applied at seeding due to yield dilution, and increased above that of the unfertilized check at fertilization rates of 60 or more kg N/ha. Nitrogen topdressing early in the growing season to unfertilized crops increased both protein and yield, and increased protein only when applied later in the growing season. Nitrogen topdressing the crops that were fertilized with N had no effect on grain yield and caused a small increase on grain protein. Soil applied N topdressings tended to be less effective than foliar application because they did not receive timely rains and adequate surface soil moisture to make the fertilizer available to the crop. Foliar applied UAN, although effective in increasing protein, may produce leaf burn, which in turn may reduce grain yields and protein.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen applied at seeding substantially increased grain yield.

Treatment
N applied at seedinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0

Not reportedComparatorSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yields had large responses to N applied at seeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first 20 to 40 kg N/ha at seeding decreased grain protein.

Treatment
first 20 to 40 kg N/ha applied at seedinge0
Outcome
Grain proteine0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
due to yield dilutione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein decreased with the first 20 to 40 kg N/ha applied at seeding due to yield dilution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 or more kg N/ha at seeding, grain protein exceeded the unfertilized check.

Treatment
60 or more kg N/hae0
Outcome
Grain proteine1
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilized checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased above that of the unfertilized check at fertilization rates of 60 or more kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain protein decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early nitrogen topdressing of unfertilized crops increased protein and yield.

Treatment
Nitrogen topdressing early in the growing seasone0
Outcome
protein and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilized cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen topdressing early in the growing season to unfertilized crops increased both protein and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen topdressing of unfertilized crops increased protein only.

Treatment
applied later in the growing seasone0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased protein only when applied later in the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing of previously fertilized crops did not change grain yield.

Treatment
Nitrogen topdressinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
crops that were fertilized with Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen topdressing the crops that were fertilized with N had no effect on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing of previously fertilized crops slightly increased grain protein.

Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
smalle0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“caused a small increase on grain protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applied nitrogen topdressings tended to be less effective than foliar application.

Treatment
Soil applied N topdressingse0
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil applied N topdressings tended to be less effective than foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar UAN increased protein but could cause leaf burn and reduce yield and protein.

Treatment
Foliar applied UANe0
Outcome
leaf burne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applied UAN, although effective in increasing protein, may produce leaf burn, which in turn may reduce grain yields and protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1775 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑

climate site · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.