Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Agronomy

Changes in Number and Weight of Wheat and Triticale Grains to Manipulation in Source-Sink Relationship

E. Ballesteros-Rodríguez; C. G. Martínez-Rueda; E. J. Morales-Rosales; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The source-sink ratio experimental manipulation has helped to define whether a crop is limited by source or sink or co-limited by both. There is no evidence in triticale of source-sink manipulations effects on yield and yield components. Two experiments were accomplished during 2008 and 2009 growing seasons at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, México, and one in 2010 at the National Institute of Agricultural Technology in Pergamino, Argentina. Two triticale cultivars (line 4 and 7) and one wheat cultivar (Tollocan) were used. Source-sink relations were modified at anthesis by thinning, degraining, shading, and total defoliation procedures. Changes in the source-sink relation affected yields in both species differentially. The changes in yield due to cultivars and treatments were explained mainly by the number of grains rather than by their individual grain weight. The number of grains was affected by all treatments in both species, while the individual grain weight was increased by thinning and degraining mainly in triticale. A greater number of fertile florets in triticale were associated with their higher rate of abortion compared to wheat. These results could help to better understand crop management and genetic improvement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Source-sink manipulation affected yield differently between triticale and wheat.

Taxon
Wheat and TriticaleTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
Changes in the source-sink relatione0
Outcome
yieldse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in the source-sink relation affected yields in both species differentially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differences across cultivars and treatments were explained mainly by grain number.

Taxon
Wheat and TriticaleTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalet0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
changes in yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in yield due to cultivars and treatments were explained mainly by the number of grains rather than by their individual grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments affected grain number in both species.

Taxon
Wheat and TriticaleTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
number of grainse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of grains was affected by all treatments in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning increased individual grain weight, mainly in triticale.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
thinninge0
Outcome
individual grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual grain weight was increased by thinning and degraining mainly in triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Degraining increased individual grain weight, mainly in triticale.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
degraininge0
Outcome
individual grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual grain weight was increased by thinning and degraining mainly in triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1053 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale had more fertile florets associated with a higher abortion rate than wheat.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
number of fertile floretse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greater number of fertile florets in triticale were associated with their higher rate of abortion compared to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1172 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 3 positive, 11 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.