Abstract
Field studies during the rabi seasons of 2011 and 2012 revealed that novaluron 5.25 per cent + emamectin benzoate 0.9 per cent SC @750, 825 and 875 mL ha−1 against Spodoptera litura infesting cabbage was significantly superior in performance over control during both the years. The mixed formulation @ 825 and 875 mL ha−1 controlled tobacco caterpillar larvae up to harvesting period. It gave 100 per cent control from 5th day onwards after the second spray. The maximum yield was obtained @ 825 mL ha−1. Novaluron and emamectin benzoate showed additive action in mixture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture at three application rates performed significantly better than control against cabbage caterpillars.
- Taxon
- Cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- novaluron 5.25 per cent + emamectin benzoate 0.9 per cent SC @750, 825 and 875 mL ha−1e0
- Interactor
- Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera liturae0pest - Outcome
- performancee0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“novaluron 5.25 per cent + emamectin benzoate 0.9 per cent SC @750, 825 and 875 mL ha−1 against Spodoptera litura infesting cabbage was significantly superior in performance over control during both the years”
t0“Cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture at 825 and 875 mL ha−1 controlled larvae until harvest.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- mixed formulation @ 825 and 875 mL ha−1e0
- Interactor
- tobacco caterpillare0pest
- Outcome
- tobacco caterpillar larvaee0
- Direction
- controllede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mixed formulation @ 825 and 875 mL ha−1 controlled tobacco caterpillar larvae up to harvesting period”
t0“Cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture achieved complete control from day five after the second spray.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- second spraye0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 100 per cente0
- Qualifier
- from 5th day onwardse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It gave 100 per cent control from 5th day onwards after the second spray”
t0“Cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
Cabbage yield was greatest at 825 mL ha−1.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- 825 mL ha−1e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield was obtained @ 825 mL ha−1”
t0“Cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
Novaluron and emamectin benzoate acted additively in the mixture.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Outcome
- additive actione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Novaluron and emamectin benzoate showed additive action in mixture”
t0“Cabbage”
The same questions in other papers
novaluron · Spodoptera litura · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
emamectin benzoate · Spodoptera litura · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · control · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.