Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Nutrient uptake in maize under different weed and nutrient management options

Parvati Deewan; S.L. Mundra; Jigyasa Trivedi; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Results of field experiment carried out during Kharif 2011 and 2012 at Instructional Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, indicated various weed-management treatments significantly enhanced N and P uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) and reduced removal of nutrients by weeds as compared to weedy check. Maximum saving of 52.96% nitrogen and 51.87 % phosphorus was achieved with oxyfluorfen 0.15 kg/ha pre-emergence fb one hoeing 30 DAS. On pooled basis, this treatment gave 163.57% and 95.86%more grain and stover yield, respectively compared to weedy check, which was followed by metribuzin 0.25 kg/ha pre-emergence fb one hoeing 30 DAS. The yield as well as uptake of N and P by the crop was maximum with 150% RDF which were statistically at par with 125% RDF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management enhanced maize nitrogen and phosphorus uptake versus weedy check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
weed-management treatmentse0
Outcome
N and P uptake by maizee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“various weed-management treatments significantly enhanced N and P uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) and reduced removal of nutrients by weeds as compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management reduced nutrient removal by weeds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
weed-management treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
removal of nutrients by weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“various weed-management treatments significantly enhanced N and P uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) and reduced removal of nutrients by weeds as compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxyfluorfen plus hoeing saved 52.96% nitrogen.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
oxyfluorfen 0.15 kg/ha pre-emergence fb one hoeing 30 DASe0
Outcome
saving of 52.96% nitrogene0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
52.96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum saving of 52.96% nitrogen and 51.87 % phosphorus was achieved with oxyfluorfen 0.15 kg/ha pre-emergence fb one hoeing 30 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxyfluorfen plus hoeing saved 51.87% phosphorus.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
oxyfluorfen 0.15 kg/ha pre-emergence fb one hoeing 30 DASe0
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
51.87 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum saving of 52.96% nitrogen and 51.87 % phosphorus was achieved with oxyfluorfen 0.15 kg/ha pre-emergence fb one hoeing 30 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oxyfluorfen treatment raised grain yield 163.57% versus weedy check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
grain and stover yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
163.57%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On pooled basis, this treatment gave 163.57% and 95.86%more grain and stover yield, respectively compared to weedy check, which was followed by metribuzin 0.25 kg/ha pre-emergence fb one hoeing 30 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oxyfluorfen treatment raised stover yield 95.86% versus weedy check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
95.86%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On pooled basis, this treatment gave 163.57% and 95.86%more grain and stover yield, respectively compared to weedy check, which was followed by metribuzin 0.25 kg/ha pre-emergence fb one hoeing 30 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and nitrogen and phosphorus uptake were maximal at 150% RDF and statistically comparable to 125% RDF.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
150% RDFe0
Outcome
yield as well as uptake of N and P by the crope0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
125% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield as well as uptake of N and P by the crop was maximum with 150% RDF which were statistically at par with 125% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑

Oxyfluorfen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.