Paper · 2018 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Insecticides and Their Mixtures for Controlling Tuta Absoluta Infesting Tomato under Egyptian Field Conditions

El-Sayed H. Tayeb; Abd EL-Fattah A. Saad; Mahmoud. A. Elbialy

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field trials were carried at El-Ashartalaf feddan region, Behaira government, Egypt during two successive seasons of 2016 and 20117 to evaluate four insecticides and three of their mixtures against the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta under field conditions. The seven evaluated insecticidal treatments were applied in three consequent sprays within an interval of 10 days between each in addition to the treatment of untreated check. The lonely or individually evaluated insecticides included chlorantraniliprole, thiamethoxam, lufenuron and chlorpyriphos which have been sprayed according to the recommendations of the Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture. Meanwhile, their evaluated mixtures: chlorantraniliprole + thiamethoxam, chlorantraniliprole+ lufenuron and thiamethoxam + lufenuronwere were applied at the rate of half recommended dose of each insecticide within the tested mixture. The obtained results showed a more or less toxic efficiency of the individually and/or admixed insecticides against the insect throughout both the seasons of 2016 and 2017. In the first season of 2016, the mixture of chlorantraniliprole + lufenuron was comparatively high effective during the elapsed period after the 1st and 2nd spray; furthermore it was proved to be the utmost superior efficient post the 3rd spray achieving complete infestation reduction (100%) of larvae. During the second season of 2017, chlorpyriphos was the most effective tested individual insecticide. The mixture of chlorantraniliprole + lufenuron was proved again to be superior achieving reduction level of 100% after the 3rd spray. Therefore, this mixture would be recommended for achieving efficient control of T. absoluta in the growing tomato plants under field conditions. It is also better to use chlorpyriphos alone in IPM program to reduce the costs and slow down the development of resistance of this insect-pest to other involved compounds in the mixtures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual insecticides and mixtures had toxic efficacy against tomato leafminer in both seasons.

Treatment
individually and/or admixed insecticidese0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae2pestt0
Outcome
toxic efficiencye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The obtained results showed a more or less toxic efficiency of the individually and/or admixed insecticides against the insect throughout both the seasons of 2016 and 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole plus lufenuron was comparatively highly effective after the first and second sprays in 2016.

Treatment
mixture of chlorantraniliprole + lufenurone0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae2pestt0
Outcome
high effectivee0
Direction
comparatively highe0
Qualifier
after the 1st and 2nd spraye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first season of 2016, the mixture of chlorantraniliprole + lufenuron was comparatively high effective during the elapsed period after the 1st and 2nd spray;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole plus lufenuron completely reduced larval infestation after the third spray in 2016.

Treatment
mixture of chlorantraniliprole + lufenurone1
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae2pestt0
Outcome
infestation reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
post the 3rd spraye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furthermore it was proved to be the utmost superior efficient post the 3rd spray achieving complete infestation reduction (100%) of larvae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“the mixture of chlorantraniliprole + lufenuron was comparatively high effective during the elapsed period after the 1st and 2nd spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1222 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos was the most effective individual insecticide in 2017.

Treatment
chlorpyriphose0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae2pestt0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the second season of 2017, chlorpyriphos was the most effective tested individual insecticide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole plus lufenuron reduced infestation by 100% after the third spray in 2017.

Treatment
mixture of chlorantraniliprole + lufenurone0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae2pestt0
Outcome
reduction levele0
Direction
reductione0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture of chlorantraniliprole + lufenuron was proved again to be superior achieving reduction level of 100% after the 3rd spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–232 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend chlorantraniliprole plus lufenuron for control of T. absoluta in field tomato.

Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
efficient control of T. absolutae0
Qualifier
under field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, this mixture would be recommended for achieving efficient control of T. absoluta in the growing tomato plants under field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1744 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend chlorpyriphos alone in IPM to reduce costs and slow resistance development.

Treatment
chlorpyriphos alonee0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae2pestt0
Outcome
reduce the costs and slow down the development of resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is also better to use chlorpyriphos alone in IPM program to reduce the costs and slow down the development of resistance of this insect-pest to other involved compounds in the mixtures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–232 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

chlorpyrifos · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lufenuron · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.