Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Soil biological and physiochemical factors limiting the growth potential of tomato planted in waterlogged volcanic soil

Yuki Moriyama; Hiroko Yamaura; J. Ole Becker; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Many vegetable growers in Japan practice a unique waterlogged cultivation method with ample nitrogen (N) supply and microbial supplements, reporting vigorous plant growth, no soilborne diseases, and high yields. We simulated waterlogged soil conditions in greenhouse experiments to examine effects of soil pH and redox potential (Eh) as well as microbial influence on the growth of tomato seedlings. Soil pasteurization enhanced seedling growth whether the acidic, volcanic soil was waterlogged or well-drained. Among various antimicrobials, only soil treatment with polymyxin B improved shoot growth in nonpasteurized soil. The seedlings grew best in pasteurized acidic, waterlogged soil fertilized with ample potassium nitrate (KNO3), which maintained soil Eh above zero. In nonpasteurized soil, growth was severely stunted by raising soil pH progressively to 8.5 while Eh dropped to –194 mV. The results suggested that heat-sensitive Gram-negative soil bacteria and low soil Eh were key factors limiting the growth potential of tomato plants in waterlogged soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pasteurization enhanced tomato seedling growth in both waterlogged and well-drained acidic volcanic soil.

Treatment
Soil pasteurizatione0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
whether the acidic, volcanic soil was waterlogged or well-drainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil pasteurization enhanced seedling growth whether the acidic, volcanic soil was waterlogged or well-drained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among various antimicrobials, only soil treatment with polymyxin B improved shoot growth of tomato in nonpasteurized soil.

Treatment
soil treatment with polymyxin Be0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in nonpasteurized soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“only soil treatment with polymyxin B improved shoot growth in nonpasteurized soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–623 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato seedlings grew best in pasteurized acidic waterlogged soil fertilized with ample potassium nitrate, which kept soil Eh above zero.

Treatment
pasteurized acidic, waterlogged soil fertilized with ample potassium nitrate (KNO3)e0
Outcome
seedlings grew beste0
Qualifier
maintained soil Eh above zeroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The seedlings grew best in pasteurized acidic, waterlogged soil fertilized with ample potassium nitrate (KNO3), which maintained soil Eh above zero”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In nonpasteurized soil, tomato growth was severely stunted when soil pH was raised progressively to 8.5, while Eh dropped to –194 mV.

Treatment
raising soil pH progressively to 8.5e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
severely stuntede0
Qualifier
Eh dropped to –194 mVe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“In nonpasteurized soil, growth was severely stunted by raising soil pH progressively to 8.5 while Eh dropped to –194 mV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–893 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest heat-sensitive Gram-negative soil bacteria and low soil Eh were key factors limiting tomato growth potential in waterlogged soils.

Interactor
heat-sensitive Gram-negative soil bacteriae0other
Outcome
growth potentiale0
Qualifier
low soil Eh were key factors limitinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat-sensitive Gram-negative soil bacteria and low soil Eh were key factors limiting the growth potential of tomato plants in waterlogged soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1065 · show in text ↑

ph · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 10 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

processing · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.