Paper · 1989 · Weed Research

Possible rôle of allelopathy in the competition between tomato, Senecio vulgaris L. and Chenopodium album L.

J. R. Qasem; T. A. HILL

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary. The allelopathic effect of Chenopodium album L. (fat‐hen) and Senecio vulgaris L. (groundsel) on tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Ailsa Craig) plants was investigated under glasshouse conditions. A new technology was used to separate competitive from allelopathic effects. These experiments suggested that C. album had an effect on tomato through allelopathy. C. album leach‐ates significantly reduced shoot fresh and dry weights and the accumulation of N, P, K, Ca and Mg of tomato shoots. No effect was found on the quantities of these elements in tomato roots. Leachate of five plants of C. album per pot was sufficient to reduce tomato growth. Addition of 10 or 20 g kg −1 of C. album dried shoots to the soil mixture significantly decreased the fresh and dry weights of tomato plants. S. vulgaris leachates did not show significant effects on the growth or nutrient accumulation of tomato plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experiments suggested Chenopodium album affected tomato through allelopathy.

Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0
Outcome
effect on tomatoe0
Qualifier
through allelopathye0

Not reportedInteractor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These experiments suggested that C. album had an effect on tomato through allelopathy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–377 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chenopodium album L. (fat‐hen) and Senecio vulgaris L. (groundsel) on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chenopodium album leachates significantly reduced tomato shoot fresh and dry weights.

Treatment
C. album leach‐atese0
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0
Outcome
shoot fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. album leach‐ates significantly reduced shoot fresh and dry weights and the accumulation of N, P, K, Ca and Mg of tomato shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chenopodium album leachates significantly reduced N, P and K accumulation in tomato shoots.

Treatment
C. album leach‐atese0
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0
Outcome
accumulation of N, P, K, Ca and Mg of tomato shootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. album leach‐ates significantly reduced shoot fresh and dry weights and the accumulation of N, P, K, Ca and Mg of tomato shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chenopodium album leachates had no effect on mineral quantities in tomato roots.

Treatment
C. album leach‐atese1
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume1
Outcome
quantities of these elements in tomato rootse0
Direction
No effecte0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No effect was found on the quantities of these elements in tomato roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“C. album leach‐ates significantly reduced shoot fresh and dry weights and the accumulation of N, P, K, Ca and Mg of tomato shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leachate from five Chenopodium album plants per pot reduced tomato growth.

Treatment
Leachate of five plants of C. album per pote0
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0
Outcome
tomato growthe0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leachate of five plants of C. album per pot was sufficient to reduce tomato growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 10 or 20 g kg −1 dried Chenopodium album shoots to soil significantly decreased tomato fresh and dry weights.

Treatment
10 or 20 g kg −1 of C. album dried shootse0
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0
Outcome
fresh and dry weights of tomato plantse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of 10 or 20 g kg −1 of C. album dried shoots to the soil mixture significantly decreased the fresh and dry weights of tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Senecio vulgaris leachates showed no significant effect on tomato growth or nutrient accumulation.

Treatment
S. vulgaris leachatese0
Interactor
S. vulgarisSenecio vulgarise0
Outcome
growth or nutrient accumulation of tomato plantse0
Direction
did not show significant effectse0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Senecio vulgaris
Senecio vulgaris · InteractorPeter O'Connor aka anemoneprojectors from Stevenage, United Kingdom · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. vulgaris leachates did not show significant effects on the growth or nutrient accumulation of tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–919 · show in text ↑

Chenopodium album · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

processing · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.