Paper · 2018 · Planta Daninha

Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum

A. SEDDIGUI KIASARI; H. AMINPANAH; P. SHARIFI

9
claims
31
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Herbicides, as a major part of weed control strategy in paddy fields, have different impact on growth and activity of soil-beneficial bacteria such as Azospirillum species. A field experiment was conducted at Sefid Rood Livestock and Agricultural Company, northern Iran, to investigate the possibility of chemical weed control in paddy fields inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum. The experiment was designed in a factorial arrangement based on a randomized complete block with three replicates. The factors were Azospirillum application (inoculation with or without Azospirillum lipoferum) and weed management regime (butachlor application with supplementary hand-weeding, bensulfuron methyl application with supplementary hand-weeding, combination of butachlor and bensulfuron methyl application with supplementary hand-weeding, hand-weeding at 15, 30, and 45 days after transplanting, and no weeding [not weeded during the rice-growing period). The results showed that plants inoculated with A. lipoferum produced 19% higher grain yield compared to plants that were not inoculated. The highest grain yields were recorded for plots treated with butachlor with supplementary hand-weeding (4,512 kg ha-1) and for those treated with a combination of butachlor and bensulfuron methyl with supplementary hand-weeding (4500.5 kg ha-1). The lowest yield (3494.3 kg ha-1) was recorded for weedy plots. No significant interaction was detected between A. lipoferum application and weed management regime for grain yield, indicating that the herbicides had no adverse effect on the efficiency of A. lipoferum in promoting growth and grain yield of rice. There was no significant difference in the dry weights of weed between inoculated and non-inoculated plots. The dry weights of weed in hand-weeded and herbicide-treated plots were significantly lower than that of the weedy plot. In conclusion, the result of this experiment confirms the possibility of chemical weed control in paddy fields inoculated with A. lipoferum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum inoculation raised rice grain yield by 19% relative to no inoculation.

Treatment
inoculated with A. lipoferume0
Interactor
A. lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
plants that were not inoculatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants inoculated with A. lipoferum produced 19% higher grain yield compared to plants that were not inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice-growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–957 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor plus hand weeding gave one of the highest grain yields, 4,512 kg ha-1.

Treatment
butachlor with supplementary hand-weedinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
higheste3
Value
4,512 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“butachlor with supplementary hand-weeding (4,512 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice-growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–957 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest grain yields were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined butachlor and bensulfuron methyl plus hand weeding gave one of the highest grain yields, 4500.5 kg ha-1.

Treatment
a combination of butachlor and bensulfuron methyl with supplementary hand-weedinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
higheste3
Value
4500.5 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of butachlor and bensulfuron methyl with supplementary hand-weeding (4500.5 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice-growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–957 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest grain yields were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy plots had the lowest grain yield, 3494.3 kg ha-1.

Treatment
weedy plotse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3494.3 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest yield (3494.3 kg ha-1) was recorded for weedy plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice-growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–957 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation and weed management had no significant interaction for rice grain yield.

Treatment
A. lipoferum applicatione0
Interactor
A. lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant interaction was detected between A. lipoferum application and weed management regime for grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice-growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed dry weight did not differ significantly between inoculated and non-inoculated plots.

Treatment
inoculatede0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry weights of weede0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
non-inoculated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in the dry weights of weed between inoculated and non-inoculated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice-growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeded plots had significantly lower weed dry weight than weedy plots.

Treatment
hand-weedede0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry weights of weede0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
weedy plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weights of weed in hand-weeded and herbicide-treated plots were significantly lower than that of the weedy plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice-growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide-treated plots had significantly lower weed dry weight than weedy plots.

Treatment
herbicide-treatede0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry weights of weede0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
weedy plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weights of weed in hand-weeded and herbicide-treated plots were significantly lower than that of the weedy plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice-growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–957 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical weed control is feasible in paddy fields inoculated with A. lipoferum.

Interactor
A. lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume0symbiont
Outcome
chemical weed control in paddy fields inoculated with A. lipoferume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“confirms the possibility of chemical weed control in paddy fields inoculated with A. lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–2025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chemical Weed Control in Paddy Fields Inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice-growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–957 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum lipoferum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.