Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at the Agricultural Research Station, Bailhongal, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad during Kharif 2006 and 2007 to asses crop loss due to stem fly in soybean under two dates of sowing. The level of stem fly incidence was higher up to flowering stage and extended up to harvesting stage with no much variation in the level of incidence. Among the treatments, seed treatment with thiamethoxam and foliar application of chemicals (T1 to T5) recorded significantly lower seedling mortality, stem fly incidence and stem tunnelling percentage compared to recommended package and untreated check. The T5 treatment (seed treatment with thiamethoxam – imidacloprid – chlorpyriphos– monocrotophos) recorded average higher seed yield of 24.44 and 19.38 q/ha in first and second dates of sowings, respectively. Whereas, the lower seed yield (16.33 and 11.47 q/ha) was recorded with untreated check in both the dates of sowing respectively. In first date of sowing the avoidable crop loss was more in thiamethoxam treated treatments and foliar application of chemicals (T1 to T5) which ranged from 27.16 to 33.40 per cent as compared to recommended package of practice (RPP) which recorded lowest avoidable crop loss of 5.91 per cent where as in second date of sowing the treatment T5 recorded highest of 40.81 per cent avoidable crop loss where as lowest of 24.56 per cent in RPP.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Stem fly incidence was higher through flowering and persisted to harvest with little variation.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Interactor
- stem flye0pest
- Outcome
- stem fly incidencee0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“stem fly Melenogromyza sojae (Zehntner) in soybean”
e0“The level of stem fly incidence was higher up to flowering stage and extended up to harvesting stage with no much variation in the level of incidence”
Claim · model-written summary
Insecticide treatments lowered seedling mortality, fly incidence and stem tunnelling relative to recommended practice and untreated checks.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- seed treatment with thiamethoxam and foliar application of chemicals (T1 to T5)e0
- Interactor
- stem flye0pest
- Outcome
- seedling mortality, stem fly incidence and stem tunnelling percentagee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- recommended package and untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“soybean”
e0“seed treatment with thiamethoxam and foliar application of chemicals (T1 to T5) recorded significantly lower seedling mortality, stem fly incidence and stem tunnelling percentage compared to recommended package and untreated check”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 produced 24.44 seed yield for sowing date first.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- T5 treatment (seed treatment with thiamethoxam – imidacloprid – chlorpyriphos– monocrotophos)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 24.44e0
- Qualifier
- firste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“soybean”
e0“The T5 treatment (seed treatment with thiamethoxam – imidacloprid – chlorpyriphos– monocrotophos) recorded average higher seed yield of 24.44 and 19.38 q/ha in first and second dates of sowings, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 produced 19.38 q/ha seed yield for sowing date second.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- T5 treatment (seed treatment with thiamethoxam – imidacloprid – chlorpyriphos– monocrotophos)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 19.38 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- seconde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“soybean”
e0“The T5 treatment (seed treatment with thiamethoxam – imidacloprid – chlorpyriphos– monocrotophos) recorded average higher seed yield of 24.44 and 19.38 q/ha in first and second dates of sowings, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated soybean yielded 16.33 at the first sowing.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“soybean”
e0“the lower seed yield (16.33 and 11.47 q/ha) was recorded with untreated check in both the dates of sowing respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated soybean yielded 11.47 q/ha at the second sowing.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- untreated checke0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 11.47 q/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“soybean”
e0“the lower seed yield (16.33 and 11.47 q/ha) was recorded with untreated check in both the dates of sowing respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
At first sowing, T1–T5 had 27.16 to 33.40 percent avoidable loss versus 5.91 percent under recommended practice.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam treated treatments and foliar application of chemicals (T1 to T5)e0
- Outcome
- avoidable crop losse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 27.16 to 33.40 per cente0
- Qualifier
- 5.91 per cente0
- Comparator
- recommended package of practice (RPP)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“soybean”
e0“In first date of sowing the avoidable crop loss was more in thiamethoxam treated treatments and foliar application of chemicals (T1 to T5) which ranged from 27.16 to 33.40 per cent as compared to recommended package of practice (RPP) which recorded lowest avoidable crop loss of 5.91 per cent”
Claim · model-written summary
At second sowing, T5 had 40.81 percent avoidable loss versus 24.56 percent under recommended practice.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- T5e0
- Outcome
- avoidable crop losse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 40.81 per cente0
- Qualifier
- 24.56 per cente0
- Comparator
- RPPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“soybean”
e0“in second date of sowing the treatment T5 recorded highest of 40.81 per cent avoidable crop loss where as lowest of 24.56 per cent in RPP”
The same questions in other papers
monocrotophos · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
imidacloprid · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →thiamethoxam · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
chlorpyrifos · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
thiamethoxam · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →seed treatment · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →application · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →seed treatment · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.