Paper · 2018 · International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Assessment of sustainable and biodegradable agricultural substrates for eminence production of cucumber for kitchen gardening

Mubeen Sarwar; Sumreen Anjum; Muhammad Arslan Khan; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Different agricultural substrates were evaluated for growth and productivity of cucumber under pot culture for kitchen gardening. Several agricultural substrates such as leaf compost, compost, perlite, and coconut compost were used in with silt in several combinations. Seeds were sown in plastic pots of 9-L capacity and filled with growing substrates in various combinations. The study consisted of eight treatments; each treatment had four replicates. Use of different growing media alone or in combination significantly enhanced plant growth and productivity, compared to control. Results showed that maximum germination, plant growth, emergence percentage, gas exchange attributes, shoot/root length, shoot fresh and dry biomass, root fresh and dry biomass, no. of leaves, leaf mineral contents, and chlorophyll concentration and yield was noted in the plants grown in leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combination. In case of proline contents, all treatment combinations showed non-significant; but, NPK status varied because of the presence of organic matter in substrates that ultimately enhanced the nutrient uptake of cucumber plants. Although all media either alone or in combination positively influenced different studied parameters of cucumber, but, leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) combination was the best. Therefore, leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combination could be considered suitable for the cucumber cultivation in the form of kitchen gardening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing media significantly enhanced cucumber plant growth and productivity compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
different growing media alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
plant growth and productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of different growing media alone or in combination significantly enhanced plant growth and productivity, compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf compost, perlite and silt gave maximum cucumber germination, growth and emergence.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combinatione0
Outcome
germination, plant growth, emergence percentagee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum germination, plant growth, emergence percentage, gas exchange attributes, shoot/root length, shoot fresh and dry biomass, root fresh and dry biomass, no. of leaves, leaf mineral contents, and chlorophyll concentration and yield was noted in the plants grown in leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf compost, perlite and silt maximized cucumber gas exchange, shoot and root length and biomass.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combinatione0
Outcome
gas exchange attributes, shoot/root length, shoot fresh and dry biomasse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum germination, plant growth, emergence percentage, gas exchange attributes, shoot/root length, shoot fresh and dry biomass, root fresh and dry biomass, no. of leaves, leaf mineral contents, and chlorophyll concentration and yield was noted in the plants grown in leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf compost, perlite and silt maximized cucumber root biomass, leaf number and leaf minerals.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combinatione0
Outcome
root fresh and dry biomass, no. of leaves, leaf mineral contentse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum germination, plant growth, emergence percentage, gas exchange attributes, shoot/root length, shoot fresh and dry biomass, root fresh and dry biomass, no. of leaves, leaf mineral contents, and chlorophyll concentration and yield was noted in the plants grown in leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf compost, perlite and silt maximized cucumber chlorophyll concentration and yield.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combinatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentration and yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum germination, plant growth, emergence percentage, gas exchange attributes, shoot/root length, shoot fresh and dry biomass, root fresh and dry biomass, no. of leaves, leaf mineral contents, and chlorophyll concentration and yield was noted in the plants grown in leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content did not differ significantly across substrate treatments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
all treatment combinationse0
Outcome
proline contentse0
Direction
non-significante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of proline contents, all treatment combinations showed non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK status varied with substrate organic matter, which enhanced cucumber nutrient uptake.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
nutrient uptake of cucumber plantse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
presence of organic matter in substratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK status varied because of the presence of organic matter in substrates that ultimately enhanced the nutrient uptake of cucumber plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1154 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend leaf compost, perlite and silt for cucumber kitchen gardening.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combination could be considered suitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, leaf compost + perlite + silt (1:1:1) media combination could be considered suitable for the cucumber cultivation in the form of kitchen gardening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1496 · show in text ↑

growing medium · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

in vitro · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

in vitro · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

growing medium · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 179 positive, 23 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

in vitro · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: gas exchange · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.