Paper · 2018 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Water Deficit Synchronizes Berry Color Development in Crimson Seedless Table Grapes

Arturo Calderon-Orellana; Nicolás Bambach; Felipe Aburto; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Crimson Seedless is one of the most important table grape cultivars in the world, but often exhibits uneven berry color when grown in warm climates. Deficit irrigation is used extensively by growers during the ripening phase to advance fruit maturity and color, but there is a lack of information about the relationship between irrigation practices and fruit ripening variability. We imposed deficit irrigation in a commercial Crimson Seedless vineyard in the Maipo Valley, Chile, from veraison to harvest in two consecutive seasons. The fruit was tested for uniformity of Brix, firmness, and the color parameters “L”, “a”, “b”, and the Color Index of Red Grapes using analysis of variance on absolute residuals (Levene’s test). Postveraison water stress increased water productivity, Brix, and slightly improved berry coloration, but did not affect berry weight, size, or firmness. Moderate levels of water stress improved color uniformity at harvest, as lower values of leaf water potential were associated with a lower percentage of green berries that never matured. These results confirmed the role of deficit irrigation in the table grape ripening process. In contrast, extending the fruit ripening period by delaying harvest beyond 18 Brix did not increase color accumulation, but did increase berry shatter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postveraison water stress increased water productivity and Brix.

Taxon
grapee0t0
Treatment
Postveraison water stresse0t0
Outcome
water productivity, Brixe0t0
Direction
increasede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Postveraison water stress increased water productivity, Brix, and slightly improved berry coloration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postveraison water stress slightly improved berry coloration.

Taxon
grapee0t0
Treatment
Postveraison water stresse0t0
Outcome
berry coloratione0t0
Direction
improvede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Postveraison water stress increased water productivity, Brix, and slightly improved berry coloration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postveraison water stress did not affect berry weight, size or firmness.

Taxon
grapee0t0
Treatment
Postveraison water stresse0t0
Outcome
berry weight, size, or firmnesse0t0
Direction
did not affecte0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Postveraison water stress increased water productivity, Brix, and slightly improved berry coloration, but did not affect berry weight, size, or firmness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress improved harvest color uniformity.

Taxon
grapee0t0
Organ / stage
harveste0t0
Treatment
Moderate levels of water stresse0t0
Outcome
color uniformitye0t0
Direction
improvede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate levels of water stress improved color uniformity at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower leaf water potential was associated with fewer green berries that never matured.

Taxon
grapee0t0
Organ / stage
leafe0t0
Outcome
percentage of green berries that never maturede0t0
Direction
lowere0t0
Qualifier
lower values of leaf water potentiale0t0

Verbatim

e0

“lower values of leaf water potential were associated with a lower percentage of green berries that never matured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying harvest beyond 18 Brix did not increase color accumulation.

Taxon
grapee0t0
Treatment
delaying harvest beyond 18 Brixe0t0
Outcome
color accumulatione0t0
Direction
did not increasee0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“delaying harvest beyond 18 Brix did not increase color accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying harvest beyond 18 Brix increased berry shatter.

Taxon
grapee0t0
Treatment
delaying harvest beyond 18 Brixe0t0
Outcome
berry shattere0t0
Direction
increasee0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“delaying harvest beyond 18 Brix did not increase color accumulation, but did increase berry shatter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · VitisResults differ

26 papers: 12 positive, 14 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

drought · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.