Paper · 2018 · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT POSTHARVEST APPLICATIONS ON SOME PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES IN ‘RUBYGEM’ AND ‘SABRINA’ STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA X ANANASSA DUCH.) CULTIVARS

O TEKIN; Ş ÇAVUŞOĞLU

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of two standards strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cultivars 'Rubygem' and 'Sabrina' grown under protected cultivation system in Mersin province in Turkey. The fruit quality preservation during storage in Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) at different storage temperatures as well as preservative compatibility under Ultraviolet-C (UV-C), hot water and combined applications were studied. Strawberry fruits kept in cold temperatures (0 C and 5 C) for 20 days and biochemical changes (total phenolic content, total antioxidant capacity, vitamin C content and sugar content) were measured after harvest and storage The 'cv. Rubygem' kept its quality for 16 days in all treatments and for 20 days in UV-C and UV-C + hot water applications when kept at 0 C. Also, the fruits stored at 5 C kept their quality for 12 days and it was observed that hot water and UV-C + hot water treatments got better results in the same period and at the same storage temperature. In the 'cv. Sabrina' results showed that fruit samples at 0 C were successfully maintained in control as well as the other 3 treatments until the 12 th day. The preservation was continued in UV-C, hot water and combined treatments on the 16 th day of the storage and the best ones were the hot water and UV-C + hot water at the end of the 20 th day. As a result, it was observed that total phenolic contents, total antioxidant activity and sugar were found decrease at the end of storage for both cultivars while fluctuations in vitamin C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubygem fruit retained quality for 16 days across treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Rubygeme0
Outcome
kept its qualitye0
Value
16 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'cv. Rubygem' kept its quality for 16 days in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–727 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0 C, Rubygem quality lasted 20 days with UV-C.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae2
Material
Rubygeme1
Treatment
UV-Ce0
Outcome
kept its qualitye1
Value
20 dayse0
Qualifier
0 Ce0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for 20 days in UV-C and UV-C + hot water applications when kept at 0 C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–802 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 'cv. Rubygem' kept its quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–697 · show in text ↑
e2

“strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5 C, fruit quality lasted 12 days.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
kept their qualitye0
Value
12 dayse0
Qualifier
5 Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruits stored at 5 C kept their quality for 12 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Sabrina, fruit quality at 0 C was maintained through day 12 in all treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Sabrinae0
Outcome
successfully maintainede0
Value
12 th daye0
Qualifier
0 Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the 'cv. Sabrina' results showed that fruit samples at 0 C were successfully maintained in control as well as the other 3 treatments until the 12 th day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sabrina preservation continued through day 16 with UV-C, hot water and combined treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae2
Material
Sabrinae1
Outcome
preservation was continuede0
Value
16 th daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The preservation was continued in UV-C, hot water and combined treatments on the 16 th day of the storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1270 · show in text ↑
e1

“'cv. Sabrina'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1028 · show in text ↑
e2

“strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic contents, antioxidant activity and sugar decreased at the end of storage for both cultivars.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
total phenolic contents, total antioxidant activity and sugare0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolic contents, total antioxidant activity and sugar were found decrease at the end of storage for both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1514 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C fluctuated during storage.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
fluctuationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluctuations in vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1546 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–98 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: general · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.