Paper · 2013 · Nanfang nongye xuebao

Effects of different dehydration rates on antioxidant system of maize embryo.

Luo YaTing; Xianliang Cui; Su ZhiLong; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】The maize embryos at 20, 24 and 32 days after pollination (DAP) were used as experimental materials to investigate the effects of different drying rates on antioxidant system. 【Method】Based on conventional planting,the corn was pollinated artificially and bagged After 20, 24 and 32 days, the embryos were picked and performed slow and fast dehydration experiments to detect the physiological indices of intact embryos. 【Result】The results showed that maize seeds with longer bagging time exhibited slower dehydration rate decreasing under slow dehydration. Under slow dehydration, the embryos had higher survival rate and lower relative electrolytic leakage rate. Under fast dehydration, the embryos at the three stages had higher MDA content and higher activities of GR and DHAR, while the AsA content was too low to be detected. GSH contents were high both in 20 DAP embryos for fast-dehydration and in 32 DAP embryos for slow dehydra-tion. In 24 DAP embryos, no significant difference was observed between the two dehydration rates. 【Conclusion】Compared with fast dehydration, maize embryo was more tolerant to slow dehydration, which had less harm on corn embryo. GSH played a dominant role in desiccation tolerance of maize embryo.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer bagging time was associated with slower dehydration under slow dehydration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
longer bagging timee0
Outcome
dehydration ratee0
Direction
slowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize seeds with longer bagging time exhibited slower dehydration rate decreasing under slow dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow dehydration yielded higher embryo survival.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
slow dehydratione0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under slow dehydration, the embryos had higher survival rate and lower relative electrolytic leakage rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow dehydration yielded lower relative electrolytic leakage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
slow dehydratione0
Outcome
relative electrolytic leakage ratee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under slow dehydration, the embryos had higher survival rate and lower relative electrolytic leakage rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fast dehydration increased MDA content at all three stages.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fast dehydratione0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under fast dehydration, the embryos at the three stages had higher MDA content and higher activities of GR and DHAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fast dehydration increased GR and DHAR activities at all three stages.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fast dehydratione0
Outcome
activities of GR and DHARe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under fast dehydration, the embryos at the three stages had higher MDA content and higher activities of GR and DHAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AsA content under fast dehydration was too low to detect.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
AsA contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the AsA content was too low to be detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH contents were high in fast-dehydrated 20 DAP embryos.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
20 DAP embryose0
Treatment
fast-dehydratione0
Outcome
GSH contentse0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSH contents were high both in 20 DAP embryos for fast-dehydration and in 32 DAP embryos for slow dehydra-tion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH contents were high in slow-dehydrated 32 DAP embryos.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
32 DAP embryose0
Treatment
slow dehydra-tione0
Outcome
GSH contentse0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSH contents were high both in 20 DAP embryos for fast-dehydration and in 32 DAP embryos for slow dehydra-tion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 DAP, the dehydration rates produced no significant difference.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
two dehydration ratese0
Outcome
differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
two dehydration ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 24 DAP embryos, no significant difference was observed between the two dehydration rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize embryos were more tolerant of slow than fast dehydration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
slow dehydratione0
Outcome
tolerante0
Direction
more tolerante0
Comparator
fast dehydratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with fast dehydration, maize embryo was more tolerant to slow dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1142 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed maize embryo desiccation tolerance chiefly to GSH.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Compound
GSHe0
Outcome
desiccation tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSH played a dominant role in desiccation tolerance of maize embryo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 · show in text ↑

drought · survival · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 11 positive, 15 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

96 papers: 8 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.