Paper · 2018 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Effects of Biochar Mixes with Peat-moss BasedSubstrates on Growth and Development ofHorticultural Crops

Donghui Peng; Mengmeng Gu; Yan Zhao; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study investigated the potential of using biochar as a container substrate component to replace peat moss to produce horticultural crops. Biochar was incorporated into commercially available peat moss-based substrate (PM) at 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% (vol.) to grow chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and basil (Ocimum basilicum) in containers. Responses of plant growth to the percentage of biochar in substrate mixes was different for the crops. Chrysanthemum grown in PM mixes with 60%, 80% and 100% biochar had significantly higher shoot fresh weight (FW) than in PM alone (0% biochar), while tomato plants in PM mixes with 80% and 100% biochar had lower shoot FW, dry weight (DW), and root rating values. For lettuce, only plants grown in 100% biochar of the second crop (sowed after 52 days of the first crop) had lower FW than those grown in PM mixes without biochar. For basil, the lower root rating was observed in plants grown in PM mixes with 80% biochar, while the highest was observed in plants grown in PM mixes with 20% biochar. Basil grown in PM mixes with 20% biochar had higher dry and fresh weights than those in PM mixes with no biochar. No negative effect on plant growth was observed in mixes with biochar as high as 60%, which was probably due to the similarity between physical properties of biochar and PM tested in this experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum shoot fresh weight was significantly higher at 60%, 80% and 100% biochar than with peat moss alone.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
PM mixes with 60%, 80% and 100% biochare0
Outcome
shoot fresh weight (FW)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
PM alone (0% biochar)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chrysanthemum grown in PM mixes with 60%, 80% and 100% biochar had significantly higher shoot fresh weight (FW) than in PM alone (0% biochar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato shoot fresh weight and dry weight were lower at 80% and 100% biochar.

Treatment
PM mixes with 80% and 100% biochare0
Outcome
shoot FW, dry weight (DW)e0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants in PM mixes with 80% and 100% biochar had lower shoot FW, dry weight (DW), and root rating values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato root ratings were lower at 80% and 100% biochar.

Treatment
PM mixes with 80% and 100% biochare0
Outcome
root rating valuese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants in PM mixes with 80% and 100% biochar had lower shoot FW, dry weight (DW), and root rating values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce fresh weight in the second crop was lower only with 100% biochar than with no biochar.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
100% biochare0
Outcome
FWe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
second crop (sowed after 52 days of the first crop)e0
Comparator
PM mixes without biochare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For lettuce, only plants grown in 100% biochar of the second crop (sowed after 52 days of the first crop) had lower FW than those grown in PM mixes without biochar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil root rating was lowest at 80% biochar.

Treatment
PM mixes with 80% biochare0
Outcome
root ratinge0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For basil, the lower root rating was observed in plants grown in PM mixes with 80% biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil root rating was highest at 20% biochar.

Treatment
PM mixes with 20% biochare0
Outcome
higheste0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the highest was observed in plants grown in PM mixes with 20% biochar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“For basil, the lower root rating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil dry and fresh weights were higher at 20% biochar than without biochar.

Treatment
PM mixes with 20% biochare0
Outcome
dry and fresh weightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
PM mixes with no biochare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Basil grown in PM mixes with 20% biochar had higher dry and fresh weights than those in PM mixes with no biochar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar mixes up to 60% showed no negative plant growth effect.

Taxon
Horticultural Cropst0
Treatment
mixes with biochar as high as 60%e0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
No negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No negative effect on plant growth was observed in mixes with biochar as high as 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Horticultural Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–103 · show in text ↑

biochar · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

52 papers: 41 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

biochar · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

80 papers: 71 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

growing medium · growth · Ocimum basilicum (basil)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biochar · growth · Ocimum basilicum (basil)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

growing medium · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

165 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.