Paper · 2018 · Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura

Mango dehydration: influence of osmotic pre-treatmentAnd addition of calcium chloride

Eliana Janet Sanjinez-Argandoña; Luciane Yukari Yahagi; Tais Boveda Costa; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Mango (Mangifera indica L.) can be characterized as a greatly accepted fruit due to its sensory attributes of flavor and aroma. However, it has a large production during the harvest season and requires preservation through processing. Osmotic pretreatment, followed by drying, provides products with higher quality and stability. The present study explored the effects of osmotic pretreatment with and without addition of calcium chloride in the nutritional characteristics and sensorial acceptance of dehydrated mango. Four different osmotic treatments were applied in mango slices followed by drying. Drying without osmotic treatment was considered control. Dried samples pre-treated with calcium had lower sugar content and higher retention of acids in the fruit. The increase of sucrose and glucose content during osmotic treatment contributed to maintaining nutritional quality and color of the product when compared with control treatment. Products dehydrated with osmotic pre-treatment were the most preferred, presenting higher purchase intention. The combination of osmotic pretreatment with convective drying provided higher acceptance of dehydrated mango due to its higher quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium pretreatment lowered sugar content in dried mango.

Treatment
pre-treated with calciume0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Drying without osmotic treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dried samples pre-treated with calcium had lower sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drying without osmotic treatment was considered control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–668 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium pretreatment increased acid retention in dried mango.

Treatment
pre-treated with calciume0
Outcome
retention of acids in the fruite0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Drying without osmotic treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dried samples pre-treated with calcium had lower sugar content and higher retention of acids in the fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–775 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drying without osmotic treatment was considered control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–668 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased sucrose and glucose during osmotic treatment helped maintain nutritional quality relative to control.

Treatment
osmotic treatmente0
Compound
sucrose and glucosee0
Outcome
nutritional qualitye0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of sucrose and glucose content during osmotic treatment contributed to maintaining nutritional quality and color of the product when compared with control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–954 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased sucrose and glucose during osmotic treatment helped maintain color relative to control.

Treatment
osmotic treatmente0
Compound
sucrose and glucosee0
Outcome
color of the producte0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of sucrose and glucose content during osmotic treatment contributed to maintaining nutritional quality and color of the product when compared with control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–954 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotically pretreated dehydrated products were most preferred.

Treatment
osmotic pre-treatmente0
Outcome
most preferrede0
Direction
most preferrede0
Comparator
Drying without osmotic treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Products dehydrated with osmotic pre-treatment were the most preferred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drying without osmotic treatment was considered control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–668 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotically pretreated dehydrated products had higher purchase intention.

Treatment
osmotic pre-treatmente0
Outcome
purchase intentione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Drying without osmotic treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Products dehydrated with osmotic pre-treatment were the most preferred, presenting higher purchase intention.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drying without osmotic treatment was considered control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–668 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of osmotic pretreatment and convective drying gave higher acceptance due to higher quality.

Treatment
osmotic pretreatment with convective dryinge0
Outcome
acceptance of dehydrated mangoe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
higher qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of osmotic pretreatment with convective drying provided higher acceptance of dehydrated mango due to its higher quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1201 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.