Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Distill Stalk End Feeding (Bunch Feeding) can Improve the Quality and Yield of Banana cv. Robusta (AAA-Group) under Hill Zone of Karnataka (Zone-09)

H.S. Sreekanth; D. Thiphesha; K. Padmanabha; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at farmer field to determine the effect of different bunch stalk feeding with different growth regulators on yield of banana cv. Robusta (AAA-group) under hill zone of Karnataka. The experiment was laid in RCBD with 16 treatments and three replications. Urea (2.0, 4.0 and 6.0 %), sulphate of potash (1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 %), 2, 4-D (10, 20 and 30 ppm), panchagavya (2.0, 4.0 and 6.0 %) and banana special (0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 %) and compared with control (without bunch stalk feeding). Results revealed that, at the time of harvest, bunch fed with 2 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly yield characters such has highest intermodal length (8.93 cm), bunch length (85.20 cm), finger girth (12.79 cm), finger weight (170.10 g),weight of hands (2.60 kg), weight of bunch (24.21 kg), total yield (60.53 t/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.68). Significant results on quality characters observed in bunch fed with 2.5 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly lowest physiological loss in weight (10.44 %), more days to ripe (14.33 days) under ambient condition, longer shelf life (8.67 days), highest total sugars (18.49 %), less titratable acidity (0.25 %), highest Sugar : acid ratio (73.14), reducing sugar (15.86 %) and non reducing sugar (2.63 %) compared to control (13.20 %, 10.67 days, 6.67 days, 15.21 %, 0.33 %, 45.62, 13.01 % and 2.20 % respectively). Bunches fed with 2.0 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly highest pulp weight (109.16 g), peel weight (42.31 g), pulp to peel ratio (2.58) and TSS (23.51 0Brix) compared to control (90.81 g, 38.00 g, 2.39 and 19.88 0Brix respectively).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave intermodal length of 8.93 cm.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
intermodal lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.93 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly yield characters such has highest intermodal length (8.93 cm), bunch length (85.20 cm), finger girth (12.79 cm), finger weight (170.10 g),weight of hands (2.60 kg), weight of bunch (24.21 kg), total yield (60.53 t/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave bunch length of 85.20 cm.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
bunch lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
85.20 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly yield characters such has highest intermodal length (8.93 cm), bunch length (85.20 cm), finger girth (12.79 cm), finger weight (170.10 g),weight of hands (2.60 kg), weight of bunch (24.21 kg), total yield (60.53 t/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave finger girth of 12.79 cm.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
finger girthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.79 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly yield characters such has highest intermodal length (8.93 cm), bunch length (85.20 cm), finger girth (12.79 cm), finger weight (170.10 g),weight of hands (2.60 kg), weight of bunch (24.21 kg), total yield (60.53 t/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave finger weight of 170.10 g.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
finger weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
170.10 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly yield characters such has highest intermodal length (8.93 cm), bunch length (85.20 cm), finger girth (12.79 cm), finger weight (170.10 g),weight of hands (2.60 kg), weight of bunch (24.21 kg), total yield (60.53 t/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave weight of hands of 2.60 kg.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
weight of handse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.60 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly yield characters such has highest intermodal length (8.93 cm), bunch length (85.20 cm), finger girth (12.79 cm), finger weight (170.10 g),weight of hands (2.60 kg), weight of bunch (24.21 kg), total yield (60.53 t/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave weight of bunch of 24.21 kg.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
weight of bunche0
Direction
higheste0
Value
24.21 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly yield characters such has highest intermodal length (8.93 cm), bunch length (85.20 cm), finger girth (12.79 cm), finger weight (170.10 g),weight of hands (2.60 kg), weight of bunch (24.21 kg), total yield (60.53 t/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave total yield of 60.53 t/ha.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
60.53 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly yield characters such has highest intermodal length (8.93 cm), bunch length (85.20 cm), finger girth (12.79 cm), finger weight (170.10 g),weight of hands (2.60 kg), weight of bunch (24.21 kg), total yield (60.53 t/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave benefit cost ratio of 2.68.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.68e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly yield characters such has highest intermodal length (8.93 cm), bunch length (85.20 cm), finger girth (12.79 cm), finger weight (170.10 g),weight of hands (2.60 kg), weight of bunch (24.21 kg), total yield (60.53 t/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two and a half percent sulphate of potash gave physiological loss in weight of 10.44 %.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.5 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
physiological loss in weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
10.44 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2.5 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly lowest physiological loss in weight (10.44 %), more days to ripe (14.33 days) under ambient condition, longer shelf life (8.67 days), highest total sugars (18.49 %), less titratable acidity (0.25 %), highest Sugar : acid ratio (73.14), reducing sugar (15.86 %) and non reducing sugar (2.63 %) compared to control (13.20 %, 10.67 days, 6.67 days, 15.21 %, 0.33 %, 45.62, 13.01 % and 2.20 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two and a half percent sulphate of potash gave days to ripe of 14.33 days.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.5 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
days to ripee0
Direction
moree0
Value
14.33 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2.5 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly lowest physiological loss in weight (10.44 %), more days to ripe (14.33 days) under ambient condition, longer shelf life (8.67 days), highest total sugars (18.49 %), less titratable acidity (0.25 %), highest Sugar : acid ratio (73.14), reducing sugar (15.86 %) and non reducing sugar (2.63 %) compared to control (13.20 %, 10.67 days, 6.67 days, 15.21 %, 0.33 %, 45.62, 13.01 % and 2.20 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two and a half percent sulphate of potash gave shelf life of 8.67 days.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.5 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
longere0
Value
8.67 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2.5 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly lowest physiological loss in weight (10.44 %), more days to ripe (14.33 days) under ambient condition, longer shelf life (8.67 days), highest total sugars (18.49 %), less titratable acidity (0.25 %), highest Sugar : acid ratio (73.14), reducing sugar (15.86 %) and non reducing sugar (2.63 %) compared to control (13.20 %, 10.67 days, 6.67 days, 15.21 %, 0.33 %, 45.62, 13.01 % and 2.20 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two and a half percent sulphate of potash gave total sugars of 18.49 %.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.5 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.49 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2.5 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly lowest physiological loss in weight (10.44 %), more days to ripe (14.33 days) under ambient condition, longer shelf life (8.67 days), highest total sugars (18.49 %), less titratable acidity (0.25 %), highest Sugar : acid ratio (73.14), reducing sugar (15.86 %) and non reducing sugar (2.63 %) compared to control (13.20 %, 10.67 days, 6.67 days, 15.21 %, 0.33 %, 45.62, 13.01 % and 2.20 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two and a half percent sulphate of potash gave titratable acidity of 0.25 %.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.5 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
lesse0
Value
0.25 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2.5 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly lowest physiological loss in weight (10.44 %), more days to ripe (14.33 days) under ambient condition, longer shelf life (8.67 days), highest total sugars (18.49 %), less titratable acidity (0.25 %), highest Sugar : acid ratio (73.14), reducing sugar (15.86 %) and non reducing sugar (2.63 %) compared to control (13.20 %, 10.67 days, 6.67 days, 15.21 %, 0.33 %, 45.62, 13.01 % and 2.20 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two and a half percent sulphate of potash gave Sugar : acid ratio of 73.14.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.5 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
Sugar : acid ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
73.14e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2.5 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly lowest physiological loss in weight (10.44 %), more days to ripe (14.33 days) under ambient condition, longer shelf life (8.67 days), highest total sugars (18.49 %), less titratable acidity (0.25 %), highest Sugar : acid ratio (73.14), reducing sugar (15.86 %) and non reducing sugar (2.63 %) compared to control (13.20 %, 10.67 days, 6.67 days, 15.21 %, 0.33 %, 45.62, 13.01 % and 2.20 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two and a half percent sulphate of potash gave reducing sugar of 15.86 %.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.5 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
reducing sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.86 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2.5 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly lowest physiological loss in weight (10.44 %), more days to ripe (14.33 days) under ambient condition, longer shelf life (8.67 days), highest total sugars (18.49 %), less titratable acidity (0.25 %), highest Sugar : acid ratio (73.14), reducing sugar (15.86 %) and non reducing sugar (2.63 %) compared to control (13.20 %, 10.67 days, 6.67 days, 15.21 %, 0.33 %, 45.62, 13.01 % and 2.20 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two and a half percent sulphate of potash gave non reducing sugar of 2.63 %.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.5 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
non reducing sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.63 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch fed with 2.5 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly lowest physiological loss in weight (10.44 %), more days to ripe (14.33 days) under ambient condition, longer shelf life (8.67 days), highest total sugars (18.49 %), less titratable acidity (0.25 %), highest Sugar : acid ratio (73.14), reducing sugar (15.86 %) and non reducing sugar (2.63 %) compared to control (13.20 %, 10.67 days, 6.67 days, 15.21 %, 0.33 %, 45.62, 13.01 % and 2.20 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave pulp weight of 109.16 g.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.0 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
pulp weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
109.16 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Bunches fed with 2.0 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly highest pulp weight (109.16 g), peel weight (42.31 g), pulp to peel ratio (2.58) and TSS (23.51 0Brix) compared to control (90.81 g, 38.00 g, 2.39 and 19.88 0Brix respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1648 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave peel weight of 42.31 g.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.0 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
peel weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
42.31 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Bunches fed with 2.0 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly highest pulp weight (109.16 g), peel weight (42.31 g), pulp to peel ratio (2.58) and TSS (23.51 0Brix) compared to control (90.81 g, 38.00 g, 2.39 and 19.88 0Brix respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1648 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave pulp to peel ratio of 2.58.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.0 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
pulp to peel ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.58e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Bunches fed with 2.0 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly highest pulp weight (109.16 g), peel weight (42.31 g), pulp to peel ratio (2.58) and TSS (23.51 0Brix) compared to control (90.81 g, 38.00 g, 2.39 and 19.88 0Brix respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1648 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent sulphate of potash gave TSS of 23.51 0Brix.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robustae1
Treatment
2.0 per cent sulphate of potashe0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
23.51 0Brixe0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Bunches fed with 2.0 per cent sulphate of potash recorded significantly highest pulp weight (109.16 g), peel weight (42.31 g), pulp to peel ratio (2.58) and TSS (23.51 0Brix) compared to control (90.81 g, 38.00 g, 2.39 and 19.88 0Brix respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1648 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–164 · show in text ↑

sulfate · quality: sugar starch · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfate · growth · MusaResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sulfate · yield · MusaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

potassium · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

potassium · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

potassium · phenology · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · quality: sugar starch · MusaResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.