Paper · 2017 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION

Management of soft rot of banana caused by Erwinia carotovora sub sp. Carotovora

MALLIKARJUN KENGANAL; YUSUF ALI NIMBARAGI; G. S. GURUPRASD

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Banana a fruit of poor and rich is source of food and fibre. It has multiple uses of its all plant parts. However, its cultivation is hampered by many diseases like in other crops. The least known soft rot disease among farmers caused by Erwinia carotovora subsp. Carotovora has become a threat to banana cultivation. The present study was aimed to identify suitable control measures of soft rot to avoid plunging banana yield. A field experiment was conducted for two years during 2014 and 2015 by imposing eight different treatments with three replications on 25 plants in each treatment in an orchard severely affected by soft rot. Results obtained were statistically analysed and yield was subjected to cost benefit ratio analysis. Among the treatments imposed, drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/l at 15 days interval, beginning from 15 days after planting and application of bleaching powder 25g/plant/month two inches away from pseudostem around the collar region upto four months was found most effective and recorded lowest soft rot disease incidence of 7.67 per cent during 2014 and 9.28 per cent during 2015. This treatment also recorded highest bunch yield of 32.9kg/plant during 2014, 30.03kg/plant during 2015. The pooled disease incidence was 8.47 per cent and yield of 31.47kg/plant. This treatment showed highest cost benefit ratio of 3.54 compared to control which had 1.6. Neither copper oxychloride nor the streptomycin sulphate alone or in combination could give better results as earlier reported. But their mixed application both by drenching and foliar spray had better impact and most effective when coupled with application of bleaching powder. The results conclude effective control of soft rot can be done without compromising the yield by following best treatment of the experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the lowest banana soft rot incidence, 7.67 per cent in 2014.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/l at 15 days intervale0
Interactor
Erwinia carotovora subsp. CarotovoraPectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorume2pathogen
Outcome
soft rot disease incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
7.67 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/l at 15 days interval, beginning from 15 days after planting and application of bleaching powder 25g/plant/month two inches away from pseudostem around the collar region upto four months was found most effective and recorded lowest soft rot disease incidence of 7.67 per cent during 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–316 · show in text ↑
e2

“soft rot disease among farmers caused by Erwinia carotovora subsp. Carotovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the lowest banana soft rot incidence, 9.28 per cent in 2015.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/le1
Interactor
Erwinia carotovora subsp. CarotovoraPectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorume3pathogen
Outcome
soft rot disease incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
9.28 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest soft rot disease incidence of 7.67 per cent during 2014 and 9.28 per cent during 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1174 · show in text ↑
e1

“drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–858 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–316 · show in text ↑
e3

“caused by Erwinia carotovora subsp. Carotovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave highest banana bunch yield of 32.9kg/plant in 2014.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/le1
Outcome
bunch yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
32.9kg/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded highest bunch yield of 32.9kg/plant during 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1252 · show in text ↑
e1

“drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–858 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave highest banana bunch yield of 30.03kg/plant in 2015.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/le1
Outcome
bunch yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.03kg/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded highest bunch yield of 32.9kg/plant during 2014, 30.03kg/plant during 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1279 · show in text ↑
e1

“drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–858 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled soft rot incidence under the treatment was 8.47 per cent.

Taxon
bananae1
Interactor
Erwinia carotovora subsp. CarotovoraPectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorume2pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
8.47 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pooled disease incidence was 8.47 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1327 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–316 · show in text ↑
e2

“caused by Erwinia carotovora subsp. Carotovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–274 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled banana yield under the treatment was 31.47kg/plant.

Taxon
bananae1
Outcome
yielde0
Value
31.47kg/plante0

Verbatim

e0

“yield of 31.47kg/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1354 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment cost benefit ratio was 3.54 versus 1.6 for control.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/le1
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.54e0
Qualifier
1.6e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment showed highest cost benefit ratio of 3.54 compared to control which had 1.6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1446 · show in text ↑
e1

“drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5g/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–858 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper oxychloride and streptomycin alone or in combination did not give better results.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
copper oxychloridee0
Outcome
better resultse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Neither copper oxychloride nor the streptomycin sulphate alone or in combination could give better results as earlier reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1574 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–316 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the combined treatment can control banana soft rot without compromising yield.

Taxon
bananae1
Outcome
effective control of soft rote0
Qualifier
without compromising the yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The results conclude effective control of soft rot can be done without compromising the yield by following best treatment of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1866 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–316 · show in text ↑

streptomycin · yield · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sulfate · yield · MusaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · yield · MusaResults agree

55 papers: 55 positive, 0 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.