Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Broad Spectrum Herbicides on Weed Dynamic, Yield and Economics of Soybean Production

Nirmala Bagotiya; Roshan Choudhary; R.S. Choudhary; et al.

4
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during Kharif, 2017 at Instructional farm of Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur. Experimental field was mostly dominated by grassy weeds namely; Echinochloa colona, Cynodon dactylon, Digitaria sanguinallis with broad leaf weeds; Commelina benghalensis, Digera arvensis, Trianthim aportulcastrum, Amarathus viridis and Parthenium hysterophorus and sedges; Cyperus rotundus. The results indicated that all the herbicidal treatments were significantly superior over weedy check with all parameters. The tank mix application of imazethapyr 75 g/ ha + propaquizafop 75 g/ha as post-emergence at 21 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight, maximum weed control efficiency and significantly improved the growth characters, yield and yield attributing characters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicidal treatments were significantly superior to the weedy check in soybean across all parameters.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
herbicidal treatmentse2
Outcome
all parameterse2
Direction
significantly superiore2
Comparator
weedy checke2
Setting
Instructional farm of Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted during Kharif, 2017 at Instructional farm of Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e2

“all the herbicidal treatments were significantly superior over weedy check with all parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mix of imazethapyr and propaquizafop applied post-emergence at 21 DAS significantly lowered weed density and weed dry weight in soybean.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
tank mix application of imazethapyr 75 g/ ha + propaquizafop 75 g/ hae3
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weed density, weed dry weighte3
Direction
significantly lowere3
Setting
Instructional farm of Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted during Kharif, 2017 at Instructional farm of Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Experimental field was mostly dominated by grassy weeds namely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–185 · show in text ↑
e3

“The tank mix application of imazethapyr 75 g/ ha + propaquizafop 75 g/ha as post-emergence at 21 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight, maximum weed control efficiency and significantly improved the growth characters, yield and yield attributing characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mix of imazethapyr and propaquizafop gave the maximum weed control efficiency in soybean.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
tank mix application of imazethapyr 75 g/ ha + propaquizafop 75 g/ hae3
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye3
Direction
maximume3
Setting
Instructional farm of Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted during Kharif, 2017 at Instructional farm of Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Experimental field was mostly dominated by grassy weeds namely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–185 · show in text ↑
e3

“The tank mix application of imazethapyr 75 g/ ha + propaquizafop 75 g/ha as post-emergence at 21 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight, maximum weed control efficiency and significantly improved the growth characters, yield and yield attributing characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mix of imazethapyr and propaquizafop significantly improved growth characters, yield and yield attributing characters of soybean.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
tank mix application of imazethapyr 75 g/ ha + propaquizafop 75 g/ hae3
Outcome
growth characters, yield and yield attributing characterse3
Direction
significantly improvede3
Setting
Instructional farm of Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted during Kharif, 2017 at Instructional farm of Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“The tank mix application of imazethapyr 75 g/ ha + propaquizafop 75 g/ha as post-emergence at 21 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight, maximum weed control efficiency and significantly improved the growth characters, yield and yield attributing characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–94 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

85 papers: 66 positive, 19 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 64 positive, 4 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

propaquizafop · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

propaquizafop · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.