Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Bio-efficacy on tank-mixed propaquizafop and imazethapyr against weeds in soybean

Manoj Kumar Sandil; J.K. Sharma; Pratik Sanodiya; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Intensive use of agro-chemicals coupled with congenial edaphic and weather conditions during Kharif season aggravate the weed menace, resulting into low yields of soybean. The experiment was conducted on the agricultural farm at Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya at Jabalpur in 2011–12. The rampant weed species identified in the experimental field was monocot weeds Cyperus rotundus (25.8 and 23.6%) followed by Echinochloa colona (23.1 and 23.3%) and Commelina benghalensis (15.6 and 17.8%). Beside these dicot weeds Eclipta alba (19.1 and 20.3%), and Alternanthera philoxeroides (16.4 and 14.9%) were also found in soybean ecosystem at 45 DAS and harvest stage, respectively. The weed menace was minimum under weed free treatment. Among the propaquizafop treatments, activity of propaquizafop at lowest dose 62.5 g/ha and highest dose 75 g/ha as post emergence was not well marked against most of weeds (broad-leaved) but imazethapyr applied at 50, 75, 100 g/ha controlled broad-leaved and grassy leaved weeds. Among herbicidal treatments, combined application of propaquizafop + imazethapyr as post-emergence 75 + 100 g/ha was most effective to reduced most of weed flora.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the soybean experimental field the rampant weed species were the monocots Cyperus rotundus, Echinochloa colona and Commelina benghalensis.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotunduse0weed
Second interactor
Echinochloa colonaEchinochloa colonae0weed
Outcome
rampant weed species identifiede0
Qualifier
Commelina benghalensis (15.6 and 17.8%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa colona
Echinochloa colona · Second interactorTauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rampant weed species identified in the experimental field was monocot weeds Cyperus rotundus (25.8 and 23.6%) followed by Echinochloa colona (23.1 and 23.3%) and Commelina benghalensis (15.6 and 17.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicot weeds Eclipta alba and Alternanthera philoxeroides were also found in the soybean ecosystem at 45 DAS and at harvest.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Interactor
Eclipta albaEclipta albae0weed
Second interactor
Alternanthera philoxeroidesAlternanthera philoxeroidese0weed
Outcome
dicot weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eclipta alba
Eclipta alba · InteractorVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternanthera philoxeroides
Alternanthera philoxeroides · Second interactorNational Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dicot weeds Eclipta alba (19.1 and 20.3%), and Alternanthera philoxeroides (16.4 and 14.9%) were also found in soybean ecosystem at 45 DAS and harvest stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed menace in soybean was minimum under the weed free treatment.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
weed menacee0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed menace was minimum under weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop post-emergence at 62.5 and 75 g/ha was not well marked against most weeds, which were broad-leaved.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
propaquizafop at lowest dose 62.5 g/ha and highest dose 75 g/ha as post emergencee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
activity of propaquizafope0
Direction
not well markede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activity of propaquizafop at lowest dose 62.5 g/ha and highest dose 75 g/ha as post emergence was not well marked against most of weeds (broad-leaved)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr applied at 50, 75 and 100 g/ha controlled broad-leaved and grassy weeds.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
imazethapyr applied at 50, 75, 100 g/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
broad-leaved and grassy leaved weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imazethapyr applied at 50, 75, 100 g/ha controlled broad-leaved and grassy leaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence propaquizafop + imazethapyr at 75 + 100 g/ha was the most effective herbicidal treatment in reducing most weed flora.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
propaquizafop + imazethapyr as post-emergence 75 + 100 g/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
most of weed florae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of propaquizafop + imazethapyr as post-emergence 75 + 100 g/ha was most effective to reduced most of weed flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 64 positive, 4 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

propaquizafop · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

herbicide · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

297 papers: 258 positive, 39 negative or no effect

257 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

293 papers more in this group

See all 297 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.