Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Bio-efficacy of Different Ready-Mix Insecticides against Thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood Infesting Bt Cotton

S.R. Padaliya; R.K. Thumar; M.G. Borad; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

With a view to evaluate bio-efficacy of different ready-mix insecticidesagainst thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis in Bt cotton, an experiment was conducted under field condition at Anand Agricultural University, Anand during Kharif 2017-18. Among the six ready-mix insecticides evaluated, acephate 50% + imidacloprid 1.8% SP and thiamethoxam 12.6% + lambda-cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC were found more effective on the basis population of thrips, whereas fipronil 5% SC and buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP were mediocre in their effectiveness. The maximum seed cotton yield (2691 kg/ha) was recorded in treatment of acephate + imidacloprid followed by thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (2645 kg/ha), fipronil (2621 kg/ha) and buprofezin + acephate(2598 kg/ha). The highest (1: 8.57) NICBR obtained with the treatment of thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin followed by acephate +imidacloprid (1: 7.44), buprofezin + acephate (1: 5.58) and fipronil (1: 4.73).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

acephate 50% + imidacloprid 1.8% SP was more effective against thrips population.

Treatment
acephate 50% + imidacloprid 1.8% SPe0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
population of thripse0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acephate 50% + imidacloprid 1.8% SP and thiamethoxam 12.6% + lambda-cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC were found more effective on the basis population of thrips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

thiamethoxam 12.6% + lambda-cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC was more effective against thrips population.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 12.6% + lambda-cyhalothrin 9.5% ZCe0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
population of thripse0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acephate 50% + imidacloprid 1.8% SP and thiamethoxam 12.6% + lambda-cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC were found more effective on the basis population of thrips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fipronil 5% SC had mediocre effectiveness against thrips.

Treatment
fipronil 5% SCe0
Outcome
mediocre in their effectivenesse0
Direction
mediocree0

Not reportedTaxonInteractorComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fipronil 5% SC and buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP were mediocre in their effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP had mediocre effectiveness against thrips.

Treatment
buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WPe0
Outcome
mediocre in their effectivenesse0
Direction
mediocree0

Not reportedTaxonInteractorComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fipronil 5% SC and buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP were mediocre in their effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–530 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

acephate + imidacloprid yielded 2691 kg/ha seed cotton.

Treatment
acephate + imidaclopride0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2691 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed cotton yield (2691 kg/ha) was recorded in treatment of acephate + imidacloprid followed by thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (2645 kg/ha), fipronil (2621 kg/ha) and buprofezin + acephate(2598 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin yielded 2645 kg/ha seed cotton.

Treatment
thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrine0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Value
2645 kg/hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed cotton yield (2691 kg/ha) was recorded in treatment of acephate + imidacloprid followed by thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (2645 kg/ha), fipronil (2621 kg/ha) and buprofezin + acephate(2598 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fipronil yielded 2621 kg/ha seed cotton.

Treatment
fipronile0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Value
2621 kg/hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed cotton yield (2691 kg/ha) was recorded in treatment of acephate + imidacloprid followed by thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (2645 kg/ha), fipronil (2621 kg/ha) and buprofezin + acephate(2598 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

buprofezin + acephate yielded 2598 kg/ha seed cotton.

Treatment
buprofezin + acephatee0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Value
2598 kg/hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed cotton yield (2691 kg/ha) was recorded in treatment of acephate + imidacloprid followed by thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (2645 kg/ha), fipronil (2621 kg/ha) and buprofezin + acephate(2598 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin returned NICBR 1: 8.57.

Treatment
thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrine0
Outcome
NICBRe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1: 8.57e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest (1: 8.57) NICBR obtained with the treatment of thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin followed by acephate +imidacloprid (1: 7.44), buprofezin + acephate (1: 5.58) and fipronil (1: 4.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–942 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

acephate +imidacloprid returned NICBR 1: 7.44.

Treatment
acephate +imidaclopride0
Outcome
NICBRe0
Value
1: 7.44e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The highest (1: 8.57) NICBR obtained with the treatment of thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin followed by acephate +imidacloprid (1: 7.44), buprofezin + acephate (1: 5.58) and fipronil (1: 4.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–942 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

buprofezin + acephate returned NICBR 1: 5.58.

Treatment
buprofezin + acephatee0
Outcome
NICBRe0
Value
1: 5.58e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The highest (1: 8.57) NICBR obtained with the treatment of thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin followed by acephate +imidacloprid (1: 7.44), buprofezin + acephate (1: 5.58) and fipronil (1: 4.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–942 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fipronil returned NICBR 1: 4.73.

Treatment
fipronile0
Outcome
NICBRe0
Value
1: 4.73e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The highest (1: 8.57) NICBR obtained with the treatment of thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin followed by acephate +imidacloprid (1: 7.44), buprofezin + acephate (1: 5.58) and fipronil (1: 4.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–942 · show in text ↑

lambda-cyhalothrin · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiamethoxam · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

acephate · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

imidacloprid · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.