Paper · 2018 · Horticulturae

The Potential Use of Hot Water Rinsing and Brushing Technology to Extend Storability and Shelf Life of Sweet Acorn Squash (Cucurbita pepo L.)

Daniel Chalupowicz; Sharon Alkalai-Tuvia; Merav Zaaroor-Presman; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Acorn squash fruits (Cucurbita pepo L.) are very sweet and are an excellent source of nutrients and vitamins. Very little information is available about their optimal storage temperature or how to extend their shelf life. The present goal was to elucidate the best storage temperature of this fruit, and to evaluate hot water rinsing and brushing (HWRB) technology to maintain fruit quality for several months. The optimal storage temperature was found to be 15 °C. However, treating the fruits with HWRB at 54 °C for 15 s and then storing them at 15 °C significantly maintained fruit quality for 3.5 months, as indicated by higher fruit firmness, lower decay incidence, and improved retention of green skin color.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal storage temperature for acorn squash fruit was 15 °C.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepoe1
Outcome
optimal storage temperaturee0
Value
15 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal storage temperature was found to be 15 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–464 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acorn squash fruits (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water rinsing and brushing at 54 °C for 15 s followed by 15 °C storage maintained fruit quality for 3.5 months.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepoe1
Treatment
HWRB at 54 °C for 15 se0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
maintainede0
Value
3.5 monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating the fruits with HWRB at 54 °C for 15 s and then storing them at 15 °C significantly maintained fruit quality for 3.5 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acorn squash fruits (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated fruits retained higher firmness.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepoe2
Treatment
HWRB at 54 °C for 15 se1
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher fruit firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“treating the fruits with HWRB at 54 °C for 15 s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–522 · show in text ↑
e2

“Acorn squash fruits (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated fruits had lower decay incidence.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepoe2
Treatment
HWRB at 54 °C for 15 se1
Outcome
decay incidencee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower decay incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“treating the fruits with HWRB at 54 °C for 15 s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–522 · show in text ↑
e2

“Acorn squash fruits (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated fruits retained green skin color better.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepoe2
Treatment
HWRB at 54 °C for 15 se1
Outcome
retention of green skin colore0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved retention of green skin color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“treating the fruits with HWRB at 54 °C for 15 s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–522 · show in text ↑
e2

“Acorn squash fruits (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑

heat · disease · Cucurbita pepoPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.