Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Planting Density and Spacing on Growth and Yield of Onion

Pardeep Kumar; Sa vita; Sushil Kumar; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Haphazard and inappropriate plant spacing and poor soil fertility management practices are among the major factors constraining onion production. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted in Lovely Professional University from November 2017 to April 2018 to assess the influence of spacing (15×10cnm, 15×10cm and 10×10cm) and different nitrogenous fertilizers (Urea, Calcium nitrate and N:P:K mixture) on growth, yield, and quality of onion. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) of with three replications. Significant difference was observed among all the treatments. The tallest plants (63.67cm) were obtained from the treatment with N: P: K applications well as those spaced at 10 cm intra and inter row spacing. Nitrogen fertilizers and spacing interacted significantly to influence all parameters. Thus, nitrogen fertilizer across the increasing spacing significantly increased number of leaves (30 DAT) fresh bulb weight and bulb diameter. The highest value of plant height (30, 60, and 90 DAT) and number of leaves (60, 90 and 120 DAT) were observed from the application of calcium nitrate and plant spacing of 15×10 cm. whereas total bulb yield was highest in T1S2 (18.53T ha-1). It can be concluded that the highest benefit with low cost of production was obtained in response to the application of nitrogen fertilizers (urea & calcium nitrate) and spacing (15x10cm & 10x10cm) was optimum for producing the crop in the limited area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tallest onion plants (63.67cm) came from N:P:K application combined with 10 cm intra- and inter-row spacing.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
N: P: K applicationse1
Outcome
tallest plantse1
Direction
talleste1
Value
63.67cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The tallest plants (63.67cm) were obtained from the treatment with N: P: K applications well as those spaced at 10 cm intra and inter row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizers and spacing interacted significantly to influence all measured parameters.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizers and spacinge1
Outcome
all parameterse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen fertilizers and spacing interacted significantly to influence all parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer across increasing spacing significantly increased number of leaves (30 DAT), fresh bulb weight and bulb diameter.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer across the increasing spacinge1
Outcome
number of leaves (30 DAT) fresh bulb weight and bulb diametere1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen fertilizer across the increasing spacing significantly increased number of leaves (30 DAT) fresh bulb weight and bulb diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant height and number of leaves were observed with calcium nitrate and 15x10 cm spacing.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
calcium nitrate and plant spacing of 15×10 cme1
Outcome
plant height (30, 60, and 90 DAT) and number of leaves (60, 90 and 120 DAT)e1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest value of plant height (30, 60, and 90 DAT) and number of leaves (60, 90 and 120 DAT) were observed from the application of calcium nitrate and plant spacing of 15×10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total bulb yield was highest in treatment T1S2 (18.53 t/ha).

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T1S2e1
Outcome
total bulb yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
18.53T ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“total bulb yield was highest in T1S2 (18.53T ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizers (urea and calcium nitrate) gave the highest benefit with low production cost.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizers (urea & calcium nitrate)e1
Outcome
highest benefit with low cost of productione1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest benefit with low cost of production was obtained in response to the application of nitrogen fertilizers (urea & calcium nitrate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1391 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude that spacing of 15x10 cm and 10x10 cm was optimum for producing onion in a limited area.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
optimume1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“spacing (15x10cm & 10x10cm) was optimum for producing the crop in the limited area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1478 · show in text ↑

calcium nitrate · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium nitrate · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

density · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 48 positive, 6 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 157 positive, 27 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.