Abstract
The main aim of land configurations is in situ conservation of soil moisture by increasing the opportunity time for augmented water use efficiency and drain out excess water. The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad on residual soil moisture and fertility. Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting. Similarly, BBF method resulted in higher soil moisture content (32.09 % at 40 DAS) and rain water use efficiency (RWUE) of 5.96 kg ha-mm-1. The RWUE had a significant and highly positive correlation with soil moisture at 40 and 55 DAS (with r value of r=0.94** and r=0.96**, respectively). BBF method of planting also registered higher gross return (Rs.42725 ha-1), net return (¹ 27515 ha-1) and benefit-cost ratio (2.82). Cowpea can be grown successfully after summer maize on existing BBF configuration for higher yield and rain water use efficiency.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
BBF planting gave cowpea higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1).
- Taxon
- Cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Treatment
- Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of plantinge1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 13.4 q ha-1e1
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
Claim · model-written summary
BBF planting gave cowpea higher haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1).
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of plantinge1
- Outcome
- haulm yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 25.6 q ha-1e1
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
Claim · model-written summary
BBF planting gave cowpea higher harvest index (34.4 %).
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of plantinge1
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 34.4 %e1
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
Claim · model-written summary
BBF planting gave higher soil moisture content (32.09 % at 40 DAS).
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- BBF methode2
- Outcome
- soil moisture contente2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 32.09 % at 40 DASe2
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
e2“Similarly, BBF method resulted in higher soil moisture content (32.09 % at 40 DAS) and rain water use efficiency (RWUE) of 5.96 kg ha-mm-1”
Claim · model-written summary
BBF planting gave higher rain water use efficiency (5.96 kg ha-mm-1).
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- BBF methode2
- Outcome
- rain water use efficiency (RWUE)e2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 5.96 kg ha-mm-1e2
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
e2“Similarly, BBF method resulted in higher soil moisture content (32.09 % at 40 DAS) and rain water use efficiency (RWUE) of 5.96 kg ha-mm-1”
Claim · model-written summary
BBF planting gave higher gross return (Rs.42725 ha-1) in cowpea.
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- BBF method of plantinge3
- Outcome
- gross returne3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- Rs.42725 ha-1e3
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
e3“BBF method of planting also registered higher gross return (Rs.42725 ha-1), net return (¹ 27515 ha-1) and benefit-cost ratio (2.82)”
Claim · model-written summary
BBF planting gave higher net return (27515 ha-1) in cowpea.
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- BBF method of plantinge3
- Outcome
- net returne3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 27515 ha-1e3
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
e3“BBF method of planting also registered higher gross return (Rs.42725 ha-1), net return (¹ 27515 ha-1) and benefit-cost ratio (2.82)”
Claim · model-written summary
BBF planting gave higher benefit-cost ratio (2.82) in cowpea.
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Treatment
- BBF method of plantinge3
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 2.82e3
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
e3“BBF method of planting also registered higher gross return (Rs.42725 ha-1), net return (¹ 27515 ha-1) and benefit-cost ratio (2.82)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rain water use efficiency correlated significantly and positively with soil moisture at 40 DAS (r=0.94).
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Outcome
- RWUEe4
- Direction
- increaseinferrede4
- Value
- r=0.94**e4
- Qualifier
- highly positive correlatione4
- Comparator
- soil moisturee4
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
e4“The RWUE had a significant and highly positive correlation with soil moisture at 40 and 55 DAS (with r value of r=0.94** and r=0.96**, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rain water use efficiency correlated significantly and positively with soil moisture at 55 DAS (r=0.96).
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
- Outcome
- RWUEe4
- Direction
- increaseinferrede4
- Value
- r=0.96**e4
- Qualifier
- highly positive correlatione4
- Comparator
- soil moisturee4
- Setting
- rainfed conditions of Dharwade0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field study was conducted for two years under rainfed conditions of Dharwad”
e1“Cowpea produced higher grain yield (13.4 q ha-1), haulm yield (25.6 q ha-1) and harvest index (34.4 %) with Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF) method of planting”
e4“The RWUE had a significant and highly positive correlation with soil moisture at 40 and 55 DAS (with r value of r=0.94** and r=0.96**, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea can be grown successfully after summer maize on the existing BBF configuration for higher yield and rain water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae5
- Outcome
- grown successfully after summer maize on existing BBF configuratione5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Cowpea can be grown successfully after summer maize on existing BBF configuration for higher yield and rain water use efficiency”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: grain · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
irrigation · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →irrigation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.